Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Others believe that wars entrench the status quo. Looking at the major wars fought by the US (Indian wars may be considered collectively as a single war), with which side (if either) do you most agree, and why? [
Sample Answer
When considering the question of whether wars entrench the status quo, it is essential to analyze the major wars fought by the United States and determine which side of the argument holds more weight. While there is room for debate, I would argue that wars, particularly major ones, tend to entrench the status quo.
One can observe this pattern by examining historical conflicts such as World War I, World War II, and the Vietnam War. These wars involved significant global powers and had far-reaching consequences. In each case, the aftermath of the conflicts solidified existing power structures and geopolitical arrangements.
In World War I, for example, although the war resulted in the collapse of empires and the redrawing of borders, the establishment of the Treaty of Versailles did not fundamentally alter the balance of power or address the underlying issues that led to the conflict. The status quo among major powers remained largely intact.
Similarly, World War II led to the defeat of the Axis powers and the emergence of new global players. However, with the formation of the United Nations and the division of Europe into Eastern and Western blocs, the status quo of power relations was maintained. The war did not fundamentally reshape the global order but rather solidified existing alliances and power dynamics.
The Vietnam War provides another example. Despite the immense human and economic costs, the outcome of the war did not bring about significant changes in the regional balance of power or challenge the status quo in a transformative way. The war ended with a political compromise that left Vietnam divided into North and South, ultimately failing to achieve its intended goals.
In all these cases, while there were some shifts in power and territorial boundaries, the wars ultimately entrenching the existing power structures. The status quo prevailed, albeit with some modifications. This suggests that wars tend to be more effective in maintaining or reinforcing the existing order rather than bringing about radical change.
In conclusion, based on an analysis of major wars fought by the United States, it is evident that wars have a tendency to entrench the status quo. While conflicts may result in some alterations to power dynamics and territorial arrangements, they often fail to bring about transformative change. The maintenance of existing power structures and geopolitical arrangements is a prevailing trend in the aftermath of major wars.
