Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Do Vasubandhu’s arguments succeed in disproving the ultimate reality of the self, and in offering an alternative account of our sense of self-identity, unity, and agency?
Sample Answer
Title: Vasubandhu’s Arguments: Disproving the Ultimate Reality of the Self and Offering an Alternative Account of Self-Identity, Unity, and Agency
Introduction:
Vasubandhu, an influential Buddhist philosopher, presents compelling arguments that challenge the ultimate reality of the self. His teachings seek to provide an alternative perspective on self-identity, unity, and agency. In this essay, we will explore whether Vasubandhu’s arguments succeed in disproving the existence of the self and how he offers an alternative account of our sense of self-identity, unity, and agency.
Thesis Statement:
Vasubandhu’s arguments effectively challenge the concept of an inherently existing self and propose a paradigm shift towards a more interconnected understanding of self-identity, unity, and agency.
Disproving the Ultimate Reality of the Self:
Vasubandhu’s core argument centers around the concept of “selflessness” (anatman) – the idea that there is no substantial, unchanging self. He asserts that our common perception of an independent and permanent self is an illusion. Vasubandhu argues that the self is a mere construct, a product of interdependent factors such as physical sensations, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness.
Vasubandhu employs various logical reasoning and thought experiments to challenge the existence of the self. One such argument is the “person as a mere collection” analogy. He likens the self to a chariot, arguing that just as a chariot is not separate from its constituent parts (wheels, axles, etc.), so too is the self not separate from its aggregate elements. This analogy illustrates the lack of inherent existence in the self.
Offering an Alternative Account of Self-Identity, Unity, and Agency:
Rather than an independent self, Vasubandhu proposes a view grounded in dependent arising (pratityasamutpada). He suggests that our sense of self arises due to the interdependence of various factors. According to this perspective, our self-identity is not fixed but fluid, constantly changing based on external conditions and internal mental states.
Vasubandhu’s teachings also emphasize the interconnectedness between individuals and their environment. He argues that our experience of unity arises from our shared dependence on external phenomena. By recognizing this interdependence, we can cultivate compassion and empathy towards others.
In terms of agency, Vasubandhu posits that our actions are not driven by an autonomous self but rather conditioned by causes and conditions. He contends that understanding this lack of inherent agency can alleviate suffering by reducing attachment and craving.
Conclusion:
Vasubandhu’s arguments successfully challenge the ultimate reality of the self by demonstrating its lack of inherent existence. Through logical reasoning and thought experiments, he provokes us to question our conventional understanding of self-identity, unity, and agency. By shifting our perspective towards interdependence and dependent arising, Vasubandhu offers an alternative account that emphasizes interconnectedness and promotes compassion. While his ideas may challenge traditional notions of selfhood, they provide a profound and insightful framework for exploring the nature of existence.
