No More Worries!


Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

AEW Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

Understanding Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case Study of Mr. W.G.

 

Cardiovascular
Mr. W.G. is a 53-year-old white man who began to experience chest discomfort while playing tennis with a friend. At first, he attributed his discomfort to the heat and having had a large breakfast. Gradually, however, discomfort intensified to a crushing sensation in the sternal area and the pain seemed to spread upward into his neck and lower jaw. The nature of the pain did not seem to change with deep breathing. When Mr. G. complained of feeling nauseated and began rubbing his chest, his tennis partner was concerned that his friend was having a heart attack and called 911 on his cell phone. The patient was transported to the ED of the nearest hospital and arrived within 30 minutes of the onset of chest pain. In route to the hospital, the patient was placed on nasal cannula and an IV D5W was started. Mr. G. received aspirin (325 mg po) and 2 mg/IV morphine. He is allergic to meperidine (rash). His pain has eased slightly in the last 15 minutes but is still significant; was 9/10 in severity; now7/10. In the ED, chest pain was not relieved by 3 SL NTG tablets. He denies chills.

Case Study Questions

For patients at risk of developing coronary artery disease and patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarct, describe the modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors.
What would you expect to see on Mr. W.G. EKG and which findings described on the case are compatible with the acute coronary event?
Having only the opportunity to choose one laboratory test to confirm the acute myocardial infarct, which would be the most specific laboratory test you would choose and why?
How do you explain that Mr. W.G temperature has increased after his Myocardial Infarct, when that can be observed and for how long? Base your answer on the pathophysiology of the event.
Explain to Mr. W.G. why he was experiencing pain during his Myocardial Infarct. Elaborate and support your answer.

Sample Answer

 

 

Understanding Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case Study of Mr. W.G.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), commonly known as a heart attack, is a serious medical emergency that requires immediate attention. This case study of Mr. W.G., a 53-year-old man experiencing chest discomfort, provides insight into the risk factors, diagnostic tools, and pathophysiology associated with coronary artery disease and acute myocardial infarction.

Modifiable and Non-Modifiable Risk Factors

Non-Modifiable Risk Factors:

1. Age: Mr. W.G. is 53 years old, which places him at an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases as age is a significant factor in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD).
2. Gender: Males have a higher risk of CAD than females, especially before menopause.
3. Family History: A family history of heart disease can elevate a person’s risk.

Modifiable Risk Factors:

1. Hypertension: Uncontrolled high blood pressure can damage arteries over time.
2. Hyperlipidemia: Elevated cholesterol levels can lead to atherosclerosis.
3. Smoking: Tobacco use significantly increases the risk of heart disease.
4. Diabetes Mellitus: Poorly controlled blood sugar can result in vascular damage.
5. Obesity: Excess body weight contributes to hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia.
6. Sedentary Lifestyle: Lack of physical activity can exacerbate other risk factors.

By addressing these modifiable factors, Mr. W.G. could potentially lower his risk of further cardiovascular events.

Expected EKG Findings

In cases of acute myocardial infarction, the EKG may reveal several characteristic changes:

– ST-Segment Elevation: This indicates acute transmural ischemia and is often seen in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).
– T-Wave Inversion: Reflects ischemia and may be observed in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).
– Pathological Q Waves: These may develop hours to days after an MI, indicating previous myocardial damage.

Given Mr. W.G.’s symptoms including crushing chest pain radiating to the neck and jaw, these EKG findings would be consistent with an acute coronary event.

Laboratory Test for Confirmation

Among laboratory tests available for confirming acute myocardial infarction, troponin levels would be the most specific choice. Troponins are proteins released when the heart muscle is damaged, and their elevation indicates myocardial injury. Unlike other markers such as creatine kinase (CK) or myoglobin, troponins are more specific to cardiac tissue and remain elevated for days following an infarct, providing a clearer picture of myocardial damage.

Understanding Fever Post-Myocardial Infarct

An increase in temperature following a myocardial infarction can occur due to several factors:

– Inflammatory Response: Myocardial cell death triggers an inflammatory response, leading to the release of cytokines, which can cause fever.
– Necrosis: As tissues die, they can release substances that further stimulate an immune response.

This temperature increase may be observed within hours after the event and can persist for several days as the body responds to the injury.

Explanation of Pain During Myocardial Infarct

Mr. W.G.’s experience of pain during his myocardial infarction can be explained through several mechanisms:

1. Ischemia: The inadequate blood supply to the heart muscle leads to oxygen deprivation, resulting in pain referred to as angina.
2. Nerve Receptor Stimulation: The heart muscle possesses nociceptors that respond to metabolic stress resulting in pain signals sent to the brain.
3. Referred Pain: The heart’s nerve pathways overlap with those from the neck, jaw, and shoulders, leading to referred pain in these areas during ischemic events.

The severity of Mr. W.G.’s pain (initially rated 9/10 and reduced to 7/10) indicates significant myocardial distress and highlights the importance of prompt medical intervention.

Conclusion

Mr. W.G.’s case underscores the critical nature of recognizing and responding to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Understanding both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors is essential for prevention, while timely diagnosis through EKG changes and specific laboratory tests like troponin levels can facilitate effective treatment. Furthermore, recognizing the physiological mechanisms behind symptoms such as pain and fever can enhance patient education and care strategies following such acute events.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Compute Cost of Paper

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

Our Services

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments