Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Is subjectively overly celebrated in the arts but unfairly condemned in history?Discuss with the reference to the arts and history.
Sample Answer
The Subjectivity of Artistic Celebration and Historical Condemnation
Introduction
The arts and history are two domains where subjectivity plays a significant role in how individuals and events are perceived. While artistic achievements often receive subjective praise, historical figures are sometimes unfairly condemned due to bias or changing societal norms. This essay will argue that subjectivity tends to overly celebrate the arts while unfairly condemning individuals in history, and will provide examples from both domains to support this claim.
Thesis Statement
Subjectivity in the arts often leads to excessive celebration, while historical figures are often unfairly condemned due to evolving perspectives and biases.
Subjectivity in the Arts
Art, by its nature, is subjective and open to interpretation. Artists express their ideas and emotions through various mediums, allowing viewers to perceive and appreciate their work differently. As a result, artistic achievements are often celebrated subjectively, with some works receiving immense praise while others are overlooked.
For example, consider the realm of visual art. Paintings like the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci or The Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh are widely celebrated and revered as masterpieces. However, there are countless other artists whose works may be equally deserving of recognition but have not achieved the same level of acclaim due to subjective preferences or limited exposure.
Similarly, in the world of literature, some authors like Shakespeare or Jane Austen are universally celebrated for their contributions to the literary canon. Yet, there are numerous other writers whose works may be equally impactful but have not received the same level of recognition and celebration.
Unfair Condemnation in History
In contrast to the subjectivity surrounding artistic celebration, individuals in history often face unfair condemnation due to changing societal norms or biased interpretations. Historical figures are often judged based on contemporary values, which can create an unfair portrayal of their actions or beliefs.
For instance, consider historical figures like Christopher Columbus or Thomas Jefferson. While they made significant contributions to history, they are also criticized for their involvement in slavery and colonization. However, it is essential to view these individuals within the context of their time rather than imposing modern standards on them. Failing to do so can lead to an unfair condemnation that overlooks their positive contributions.
Furthermore, historical figures from marginalized communities or underrepresented backgrounds have often been unjustly condemned or forgotten due to the biases of dominant historical narratives. This highlights how historical condemnation can be influenced by power dynamics and systemic biases.
Conclusion
In conclusion, subjectivity tends to overly celebrate artistic achievements while unfairly condemning individuals in history. The subjective nature of art allows for varying interpretations and preferences, leading to some works being excessively celebrated while others are overlooked. On the other hand, historical figures are often judged based on contemporary values rather than being understood within the context of their time, leading to unfair condemnation. Recognizing the influence of subjectivity in both the arts and history is crucial for a more nuanced understanding and appreciation of individuals and their contributions.
