The speaker’s argument is that procrastination is a prevalent issue affecting many individuals and can have significant negative consequences on personal and professional lives.
To build his credibility, the speaker uses personal anecdotes and experiences to demonstrate his own struggles with procrastination. He presents himself as someone who has first-hand knowledge and understanding of the topic, making him relatable to the audience. Additionally, he uses humor throughout the talk, which helps engage the audience and establishes a connection.
The speaker elicits an emotional response from the audience by sharing relatable situations and feelings associated with procrastination. He creates a sense of empathy and understanding by describing the anxiety, guilt, and stress that individuals often experience when they procrastinate. The emotions elicited include amusement (through humor), empathy, and a sense of self-reflection.
The speaker provides a range of evidence to support his case, including personal stories, relatable examples, and visual aids. He explains the “Instant Gratification Monkey” concept, backed by humorous illustrations, to depict the inner struggle between instant gratification and long-term goals. Additionally, he uses statistics on procrastination rates and its negative impact on productivity to further strengthen his argument.
Overall, the speaker’s argument is effective. He engages the audience through humor while discussing a serious issue, capturing their attention and maintaining interest throughout the talk. The use of personal anecdotes makes his argument relatable and credible. The combination of humor, relatability, and evidence helps to effectively convey the importance of addressing procrastination and its potential consequences.
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
