Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
In order to ‘have’ ethics, however, we must also have free will. This makes sense, right? We can’t blame someone morally if, in fact, that person did not choose the action under consideration. Or is this not the case? What do you think? What role does freewill play in human nature? Do we possess free will? Provide your best argument for or against freewill/determinism.
Sample Answer
The Role of Free Will in Human Nature: A Debate on Freewill vs. Determinism
The question of whether humans possess free will or are subject to determinism has been a longstanding philosophical debate. Free will suggests that individuals have the ability to make choices and act freely, while determinism posits that all events, including human actions, are determined by external factors. This essay will present arguments for and against free will and determinism, exploring the implications of each perspective.
Proponents of free will argue that it is a fundamental aspect of human nature. They contend that without free will, moral responsibility becomes meaningless. If individuals are not able to choose their actions, it would be unjust to hold them morally accountable for their behavior. Free will provides the foundation for ethical decision-making, as it allows individuals to deliberate and make choices based on their values and intentions.
Additionally, free will is seen as essential for personal growth and development. It grants individuals the power to shape their lives and determine their own destiny. The belief in free will can motivate individuals to take responsibility for their actions and strive for self-improvement. It provides a sense of agency and autonomy, allowing individuals to define themselves and pursue their goals.
On the other hand, proponents of determinism argue that free will is an illusion. They assert that our actions are predetermined by a complex web of causal factors, such as genetics, upbringing, and environmental influences. According to determinism, everything that happens in the universe is governed by cause and effect, including human behavior. Our choices and actions are simply the result of these underlying causes.
Determinists often point to scientific evidence, such as neurobiology and genetics, to support their claims. They argue that our thoughts and decisions are ultimately the product of neural processes and biological determinants beyond our conscious control. Our sense of agency and free will is merely an illusion created by our limited understanding of these underlying mechanisms.
However, it is important to note that the debate between free will and determinism is complex and multifaceted. Some philosophers propose a compatibilist perspective, suggesting that free will can coexist with determinism. They argue that even if our actions are determined by external factors, as long as we have the ability to act in accordance with our desires and intentions, we can still be considered to possess free will.
In conclusion, the question of whether humans possess free will or are subject to determinism is a deeply philosophical inquiry that has puzzled thinkers for centuries. While proponents of free will argue for its significance in moral responsibility and personal growth, determinists maintain that our actions are predetermined by external factors. The debate remains unresolved, with ongoing discussions exploring the complexities of human nature and the intricacies of our ability to make choices.
