Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Do we need custodians of knowledge?. Discuss with refrence to two areas of knowledge art, and human sciences.
Each area of knowledge should have a claim and a counter claim
Each areaof knowledge should have an example to backup the claim and counter claim
Sample Answer
Full Answer Section
The Role of Custodians of Knowledge: Art and Human Sciences
Introduction
Custodians of knowledge play a crucial role in preserving, curating, and disseminating knowledge within various fields. In the realms of art and human sciences, the need for custodians is a topic of debate. While some argue that custodians are essential for maintaining the integrity and continuity of knowledge, others contend that knowledge can thrive without custodial intervention. In this essay, we will explore both sides of the argument, focusing on art and human sciences as examples.
Art: Claim
Claim: Custodians of knowledge are vital in the field of art as they help preserve artistic traditions, protect cultural heritage, and ensure the longevity of artistic works.
Example: Museums and curators serve as custodians of art by carefully curating collections, preserving delicate artworks, and providing public access to cultural treasures. They play a crucial role in safeguarding important historical artworks, ensuring their preservation for future generations. Custodians also contribute to art scholarship by conducting research, organizing exhibitions, and educating the public about the significance and context of various artistic movements.
Art: Counterclaim
Counterclaim: The notion of custodianship in art restricts creativity, limits artistic expression, and hinders the exploration of new ideas and forms.
Example: Some artists argue against the imposition of custodial oversight in art, suggesting that it can stifle innovation and experimentation. They believe that art should be free from strict regulations and institutional constraints, allowing artists to push boundaries and challenge established norms. By resisting traditional custodial practices, artists can explore new mediums, unconventional techniques, and controversial themes that may not align with established notions of artistic preservation.
Human Sciences: Claim
Claim: Custodians of knowledge are essential in the human sciences as they ensure rigorous research methodologies, maintain ethical standards, and uphold the integrity of data analysis.
Example: In fields such as psychology or sociology, custodians such as academic researchers and peer reviewers play a critical role in maintaining scientific rigor. They evaluate research proposals, review manuscripts for publication, and ensure that studies are conducted ethically and follow appropriate methodologies. Custodians also contribute to knowledge advancement by critically analyzing existing research, identifying gaps, and guiding future investigations. Their expertise helps maintain the credibility and reliability of findings in the human sciences.
Human Sciences: Counterclaim
Counterclaim: Relying heavily on custodians in the human sciences can lead to gatekeeping, biased perspectives, and hinder the democratization of knowledge.
Example: Critics argue that an overemphasis on custodial control in the human sciences can create barriers for marginalized voices and perpetuate existing power dynamics. They contend that alternative ways of generating knowledge, such as participatory research or community-based approaches, can challenge traditional custodial structures and promote inclusivity. By involving diverse voices and perspectives in the research process, these approaches aim to democratize knowledge production and address systemic biases that may be present within established custodial systems.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the need for custodians of knowledge in the fields of art and human sciences is a topic of debate. While custodians provide valuable contributions by preserving cultural heritage, safeguarding integrity, and upholding ethical standards, their role can also be seen as restrictive and exclusionary. Striking a balance between custodial oversight and promoting creative freedom or democratizing knowledge is essential. It is necessary to recognize the importance of custodianship while simultaneously exploring alternative approaches that foster innovation, inclusivity, and critical engagement with knowledge within art and human sciences.
