Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
What is the “nature” vs. “nurture” debate? Apply this debate to a famous person. Do you think nature influenced them more, or nurture? In what ways? Choose a famous or infamous figure (it could be Barack Obama, the Unabomber, Michael Jordan, Michael Jackson, Jack Kevorkian, Gandhi, Oprah, Donald Trump – anybody where you can find good biographies of their life online that talks about their early childhood), and using information from their biographies, discuss whether you feel their family and environment played a role in who they became. Do you think genetics/heredity played a role?
Sample Answer
The Nature vs. Nurture Debate: Exploring the Influence on Famous Figures
The nature vs. nurture debate is a long-standing controversy in the field of psychology and sociology that examines the extent to which genetic factors (nature) and environmental factors (nurture) shape an individual’s traits, behavior, and overall development. This debate revolves around the question of whether our biological makeup or our upbringing has a more significant impact on who we become.
When applying this debate to a famous figure, it is essential to examine their early childhood, family background, and environmental influences. One such individual whose life can be examined through this lens is former President Barack Obama.
Barack Obama: Nature vs. Nurture
Barack Obama was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu, Hawaii. His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a white American and his father, Barack Obama Sr., was a black Kenyan. From an early age, Obama experienced a diverse range of influences that shaped his character and beliefs.
Family and Environmental Influences
1. Family Background: Obama’s mother and maternal grandparents played a significant role in his upbringing. His grandparents provided stability and taught him about the values of hard work, education, and empathy. His grandfather’s experiences as a World War II veteran and grandmother’s influence as a bank executive instilled a sense of responsibility and ambition within him.
2. Cultural Exposure and Identity Formation: Growing up in Hawaii, Obama was exposed to diverse cultures, ethnicities, and perspectives. This multicultural environment likely influenced his ability to empathize with different communities and fostered his inclusive approach to governance.
3. Education: Obama’s mother had a strong belief in the power of education. She enrolled him in Punahou School, a prestigious private academy in Hawaii. This educational foundation provided Obama with the knowledge and opportunities necessary for his future success.
4. Absent Father Figure: Although Obama maintained some contact with his father during his childhood, their relationship was limited. The absence of a consistent paternal figure may have influenced his drive to be self-reliant and establish strong relationships with mentors and role models later in life.
Genetics and Heredity
While the influence of nurture is evident in Obama’s formative years, it is important to consider the role of genetics and heredity in shaping his character and abilities.
1. Intelligence and Communication Skills: Barack Obama is known for his intelligence and eloquence as an orator. Although his early education may have played a role in honing these skills, there is evidence to suggest that he possessed innate intellectual abilities. His mother was an anthropologist, which suggests that he may have inherited her intellectual aptitude.
2. Resilience and Determination: Obama’s ability to overcome challenges and setbacks throughout his political career can be attributed, at least in part, to his genetic predisposition for resilience. This characteristic may have been inherited from his ancestors and contributed to his unwavering determination.
3. Leadership Qualities: In addition to his intellectual abilities, Obama demonstrated strong leadership qualities throughout his life. While environmental factors undoubtedly played a role in nurturing these qualities, it is plausible that certain traits associated with leadership are genetically influenced.
Conclusion
In analyzing Barack Obama’s life through the lens of the nature vs. nurture debate, it becomes clear that both factors played significant roles in shaping his character, abilities, and accomplishments. His family background, cultural exposure, education, and absence of a paternal figure all contributed to his development as a compassionate leader with a deep understanding of diverse perspectives.
At the same time, Obama’s genetics likely influenced his intelligence, communication skills, resilience, determination, and leadership qualities. The interplay between nature and nurture is evident throughout his life, highlighting the complexity of human development.
Ultimately, it is challenging to pinpoint whether nature or nurture had a more dominant influence on Barack Obama’s life. Instead, it is the interaction between these two forces that shaped him into the influential figure he became – a testament to the intricate interplay between genetics and environment in human development.
