Full Answer Section
Whether Capital City has violated the CJSers’ free exercise of religion
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the free exercise of religion. This means that the government cannot interfere with a person’s religious beliefs or practices, unless there is a compelling government interest that justifies the interference.
In the case of the Church of the Jurassic Spirit, the city of Capital City has argued that its interest in protecting the environment and preventing public safety hazards justifies the denial of the permit. However, these interests are not compelling enough to outweigh the CJSers’ right to freely exercise their religion.
The city’s environmental interest is not compelling because the CJSers’ ritual would not have a significant impact on the environment. The amount of oil that the CJSers would have used in their ritual is relatively small, and it would have been diluted by the time it reached the river.
The city’s public safety interest is also not compelling. The CJSers’ march to the river was not likely to cause any violence. In fact, the CJSers had a permit to march in the park, and there was no reason to believe that they would not have followed the terms of the permit.
Therefore, I believe that the city of Capital City has violated the CJSers’ free exercise of religion by denying their permit.
Whether Capital City has violated the CJSers’ right to freely assemble
The First Amendment also guarantees the right to peaceably assemble. This means that the government cannot prevent people from gathering together for a lawful purpose.
In the case of the Church of the Jurassic Spirit, the city of Capital City has argued that the CJSers’ march to the river would not have been peaceful. However, there is no evidence to support this claim. The CJSers had a permit to march in the park, and there was no reason to believe that they would not have followed the terms of the permit.
Therefore, I believe that the city of Capital City has also violated the CJSers’ right to freely assemble by denying their permit.
Whether city ordinances that require permits for a march violate the First Amendment
City ordinances that require permits for a march may violate the First Amendment if they are not narrowly tailored to serve a compelling government interest. In the case of the Church of the Jurassic Spirit, the city of Capital City’s permit ordinance was not narrowly tailored. The ordinance did not specify what criteria would be used to determine whether a permit would be granted, and it gave the city officials too much discretion to deny permits for arbitrary reasons.
Therefore, I believe that the city of Capital City’s permit ordinance is unconstitutional.
What the limits of the free exercise of religion clause are
The free exercise of religion clause is not an absolute right. The government can interfere with a person’s religious beliefs or practices if there is a compelling government interest that justifies the interference. However, the government’s interest must be truly compelling, and the interference must be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
In the case of the Church of the Jurassic Spirit, the city of Capital City has not shown that its interest in protecting the environment or preventing public safety hazards is truly compelling. The city’s interest is also not narrowly tailored, as the permit ordinance gives the city officials too much discretion to deny permits for arbitrary reasons.
Therefore, I believe that the city of Capital City has violated the CJSers’ free exercise of religion by denying their permit.
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
