Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Watch the video and respond to the bold prompt.
Prompt
If you were the CEO of a self-driving car company, would you program the car to go straight (into crates), go left (into van), or go right (into the motorcycle? Explain why?
Sample Answer
The Ethical Dilemma of Self-Driving Cars
As the CEO of a self-driving car company, the decision of how to program the car when faced with an unavoidable collision is an ethical dilemma that requires careful consideration. The video “The Trolley Problem in Self-Driving Cars” explores this moral quandary by presenting different scenarios and discussing the potential consequences of each choice.
In the given prompt, I am faced with the decision of whether to program the self-driving car to go straight into crates, go left into a van, or go right into a motorcycle. Each option presents its own set of ethical considerations, and choosing the most appropriate course of action requires weighing various factors.
If I were to program the car to go straight into the crates, it would likely minimize the risk of harm to human life. However, this choice raises concerns about property damage and potential harm to the car’s occupants. Additionally, it could set a precedent for prioritizing inanimate objects over human safety in future situations.
On the other hand, if I were to program the car to go left into the van, it may potentially save the motorcyclist at the expense of the van’s occupants. This decision would prioritize one life over multiple lives, which raises questions about the value we assign to individual lives and the potential legal implications of such choices.
Alternatively, if I were to program the car to go right into the motorcycle, it would be prioritizing the lives of the van’s occupants over that of the motorcyclist. This choice also raises concerns about fairness and equal treatment, as it would favor a larger number of lives over a single life.
In making this decision, it is important to consider public perception and trust in self-driving technology. The programming choices made by companies will influence public opinion and acceptance of autonomous vehicles. Therefore, it is crucial to prioritize transparency and involve a diverse range of stakeholders, including ethicists, engineers, and policymakers, in developing guidelines for these situations.
Ultimately, there is no perfect solution to this ethical dilemma. However, as the CEO of a self-driving car company, my responsibility would be to prioritize safety and minimize harm to human life while taking into account legal and societal considerations. It is essential to engage in ongoing discussions and establish clear ethical guidelines to navigate these complex scenarios and ensure that self-driving cars are programmed with the utmost consideration for human well-being.
