Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
With consideration of the views of two of John Locke, Lynne Rudder Baker, and Michael Tooley, answer this question: What does it take for an entity to be a person?
Sample Answer
Title: The Essence of Personhood: Perspectives of John Locke and Lynne Rudder Baker
Introduction:
The question of what constitutes personhood has been a subject of philosophical debate for centuries. In this essay, we will explore the views of John Locke and Lynne Rudder Baker on what it takes for an entity to be considered a person. While John Locke focuses on rationality and self-awareness, Lynne Rudder Baker emphasizes the importance of having a first-person perspective. By examining their perspectives, we can gain insights into the complex nature of personhood.
Thesis Statement:
According to John Locke, personhood is defined by rationality and self-awareness, while Lynne Rudder Baker argues that having a first-person perspective is essential for an entity to be considered a person.
Body:
John Locke’s Perspective:
John Locke’s view on personhood revolves around the concept of rationality and self-awareness. According to Locke, a person is defined by their ability to reason, think, and possess self-consciousness. For Locke, the capacity to engage in reflective thinking and possess a sense of personal identity is crucial for an entity to be considered a person. Rationality and self-awareness are seen as the defining characteristics that distinguish humans from other beings.
Lynne Rudder Baker’s Perspective:
Lynne Rudder Baker presents an alternative perspective on personhood, focusing on the importance of having a first-person perspective. According to Baker, being a person involves having subjective experiences and a sense of agency. She argues that entities with a first-person perspective possess consciousness and intentionality, which are essential for personhood. Baker suggests that having a first-person perspective allows individuals to have a direct and immediate experience of their own existence.
Comparison and Analysis:
While both Locke and Baker explore different aspects of personhood, they both acknowledge the significance of self-awareness. However, their emphasis differs. Locke focuses on rationality as the core defining characteristic of personhood, while Baker highlights the importance of subjective experiences and a first-person perspective.
Locke’s emphasis on rationality aligns with traditional philosophical notions of personhood. Rationality is often seen as the capacity that separates humans from other animals. On the other hand, Baker’s emphasis on a first-person perspective brings attention to the subjective nature of personal experiences and consciousness.
It is important to note that these perspectives do not provide an exhaustive account of personhood. Other philosophers, such as Michael Tooley, may offer different viewpoints that further enrich our understanding of this complex topic.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the question of what it takes for an entity to be considered a person is multifaceted and subject to varying interpretations. While John Locke emphasizes rationality and self-awareness as defining characteristics, Lynne Rudder Baker emphasizes the importance of having a first-person perspective. Both perspectives contribute valuable insights into our understanding of personhood. Ultimately, the concept of personhood remains a rich and ongoing philosophical discourse that invites further exploration and contemplation.
