Tag: Review of an article

Review of an article

Posted on | by

Review the following source:

Wyszewianski, L. (2014). Chapter 2: Basic concepts of healthcare quality. In M. S. Joshi, E. R. Ransom, D. B. Nash, & S. B. Ransom, (Eds.), The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy and tools (3rd ed.). Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

In a 2- to 3-page paper, you are to write an essay providing the following:

Rank the 6 domains in order of importance starting with the most important to the least important.
Define, discuss, and explain the importance of each domain. Be sure to cite reliable sources.
Provide a rationale to support your rankings for each domain. The use of health care examples is encouraged and citations from reliable sources to support your rationale are required.

Review of an article

Posted on | by

Review the following source:

Wyszewianski, L. (2014). Chapter 2: Basic concepts of healthcare quality. In M. S. Joshi, E. R. Ransom, D. B. Nash, & S. B. Ransom, (Eds.), The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy and tools (3rd ed.). Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.

In a 2- to 3-page paper, you are to write an essay providing the following:

Rank the 6 domains in order of importance starting with the most important to the least important.
Define, discuss, and explain the importance of each domain. Be sure to cite reliable sources.
Provide a rationale to support your rankings for each domain. The use of health care examples is encouraged and citations from reliable sources to support your rationale are required.

Review of an article

Posted on | by

 

 

Review;http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx?item=6
in the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. See Asay and Lal (2014) “Who’s Googled Whom? Trainees’ Internet and Online Social Networking Experiences, Behaviors, and Attitudes with Clients and Supervisors,” Harris and Robinson Kurpius (2014) “Social Networking and Professional Ethics: Client Searches, Informed Consent, and Disclosure,” and Taylor, McMinn, Bufford, and Chang (2010) “Psychologists’ Attitudes and Ethical Concerns Regarding the Use of Social Networking Web Sites” articles attached.(1)Examine ethical issues encountered by clinical and counseling psychologists in the digital age(2)Begin by reviewing the case of Dr. Washington attached and assume the role of a colleague to the doctor named and analyze the ethical issues encountered in the case(3)Given the situation described in the case study, recommend how your colleague should proceed(4)Provide support for your response by citing the required articles attached for this discussion(5)Consider the current and potential actions of your colleague and explain whether or not he or she is currently, or potentially will be, in violation of the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Provide support for your explanation by citing Standard 3: Human Relations in the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct(6)Explain how your colleague might avoid this type of ethical dilemma in the future(7)Describe what policy or policies you might put in place if you were your colleague?

 

 

 

 

Review of an article

Posted on | by

 

 

For this assignment, review the article:

Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks. Journal of Cyber Security, 4, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414

Address the following:

What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
Summarize the overall article.
Identify the conclusions of the authors
Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for the results
Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions)
The relevance or importance of the study
The appropriateness of the experimental design
When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. This is good practice for your literature review, which you’ll be completing during the dissertation process.