Organizational psychology

 

 

 

 

 

Organizational psychology is the branch of psychology that studies how humans interact with their work place and how it impacts productivity. All companies or organizations have unique workplace cultures, missions, visions, hierarchies, and norms.
Imagine that you are the manager of a marketing company. You notice a several complaints about workplace bullying, poor communication, and unhealthy competition and hostility amongst employees at your company. What kind of a leader will you be? What will you do to build a culture of teamwork, respect, and civility?

Organizational psychology

 

 

 

 

 

Organizational psychology is the branch of psychology that studies how humans interact with their work place and how it impacts productivity. All companies or organizations have unique workplace cultures, missions, visions, hierarchies, and norms.
Imagine that you are the manager of a marketing company. You notice a several complaints about workplace bullying, poor communication, and unhealthy competition and hostility amongst employees at your company. What kind of a leader will you be? What will you do to build a culture of teamwork, respect, and civility?

 

 

 

Organizational Psychology

 

Apply your skills in reading a journal article and interpret the main findings. To do this, you will need to read the article, identify the key research question, variables, and results. More importantly, what did the study find, and do you find the author’s conclusions to be valid? Generalizable?

1.(a) Briefly describe the central research question. In other words, what were the researchers interested in examining? (b) Identify the focal predictor (i.e., predictors). (c) Identify the dependent variables (i.e., outcomes/consequences).

2.Were there any moderators or mediators? What were they?

3.(a) Briefly describe how each focal variable was measured (hint: there were three). (b) List the control variables, and in one sentence, explain why a researcher would think it’s important to include control variables.

4.Briefly summarize what the author found. In other words, was each hypothesis supported (hint: there were two)? Indicate for each hypothesis whether it was supported or not supported. If it was supported, provide a brief statement of the interpretation. (Note: explain your interpretation of the result as if you were describing it to a non-technical audience).

5.There were a few limitations in this case. Which limitation mentioned do you think is most important? Why?