Virtue ethics, ethics of care, natural law, empiricism, and intuition

 

1. What are the known relevant facts of the case? Discuss virtue ethics, ethics of care, natural law, empiricism, and intuition found in Chapter 1 in your answers.
2. What is the ethical question(s) comes to mind? What issues must nurse Allie consider as she attempts to meet her ethical responsibility in this case? What questions remain?
3. What thoughts came to mind when both nurses went in to confront the patient? Hypothesize about the possible consequences of different decisions. What are the possible options for resolving the dilemma? What are the benefits, risks, and consequences of each? How was the patient affected?
4. Identify who will benefit and who will be harmed in view of the nurse’s commitment to the patient.
5. How would you advise Nurse Allie to proceed?
6. What do you think the patient should do in this case?
7. If you were the nurse in this case, what personal beliefs or values do you hold that you would want to take into account/be aware of as you work with the other nurses?

 

 

Natural Law

 

Based on all you have read about Natural Law present an argument for the notion that there is a natural law humans can follow to determine the right things to do in most cases or that such a law does not exist or is exaggerated. Be sure to address the differences in beliefs about morality discussed in chapter two.

 

Natural law, legal positivism, and historical jurisprudence

 

 

 

Professor Berman asserts that natural law, legal positivism, and historical jurisprudence should be integrated to explain, justify, and guide the development of law in the latter part of the twentieth century. Choose a contemporary legal issue in the United States and explain whether the three schools could successfully be integrated to reach a result that is consistent with biblical principles. Be sure to fully explain and support your position. Discuss police brutality against African Americans in the US.