Research about a significant person who was or is an advocate against racial, ethnic, LGBTQ

Conduct research about a significant person who was or is an advocate against racial, ethnic, LGBTQ+, or gender inequality. Choose a person who has had an impact on promoting equality whether through philanthropy, civil rights, teaching, or lifestyle.

You will then base your case study on this person and their advocacy for social change. You must address the following:

Introduce the person. Discuss what led them to become an advocate. Specifically, how did society shape their path?
What change were/are they looking to achieve and why? What was/is the primary message of their advocacy?
Discuss which of the sociological views (i.e., conflict, interactionism, or functionalism) help to explain the type of inequality addressed by this advocate.
Did/does their advocacy invoke a change and or influence others? Discuss why, or why not. Remember that the view or perception of social change can be viewed as positive, negative, or a combination of both.
Give an example of how this person’s advocacy has touched your own life, whether through an experience, changing of perspective, or exposure to their work though educational or social means.
What lessons do you believe we can take away from this person and apply in today’s society for the betterment of the future?

Ethnic, racial, gender, or class) that are affecting people in a local area, workplace

Develop a 10–12 slide presentation in which you:

Revise the ideas and concepts from Parts 1 and 2 of your articles.

Your slide deck should:

Introduce the topic area with a quote, question, and/or statistic, along with an overview and a thesis statement. (Grab the audience’s interest.)
Highlight 3–5 major historical factors (social events/attitudes, wars, laws, economy, political environment, et cetera) in the past 50–100 years that have contributed to the current issue(s)/problems for this topic area.
Highlight 3–5 major current issues/problems (economic, social, political, legal, et cetera).
Describe 1–2 groups of people affected by the issue/problem, including 1–2 quotes and/or paraphrased comments from the people affected.
Propose 2–3 changes (economic, social, political, legal, et cetera) that could possibly improve the situation.
Highlight 2–3 likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, et cetera) to achieving the proposed change(s).
Provide a brief logical response to each of the challenges.
Highlight 2–3 possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, et cetera) that could be realized following the proposed change(s).
Include 2–3 thought-provoking questions to which the audience should be asked to respond.
Provide a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and/or statistic, along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action.