Skip to content
Realism was a dominant literary trend of the period after the Civil War in America. William Howells defines Literary Realism as “nothing more and nothing less than the truthful treatment of material.” Describe how Mark Twain and Henry James introduced Realism, through their work, to the American reader. In your description show their similarities and differences.
write an ESSAY that answers the following question + follows the instructions POINT BY POINT CAREFULLY :
the question is :
Irving’s “Rip Van Winkle” is on one hand an entertaining folk tale that represents the culture of the genre in America and, on the other hand, a story that represents provocative satiric commentary on American cultural issues. Explain how Rip Van Winkle can be seen as a “measuring stick” of the American history and identity.
“BookBinders_RFM_Data_W21_EC” and to answer “MKTG462_RFM_Exercise”
the PowerPoint “MKTG462_Class_Slides_MA4_W21_EC” to give you an idea about the whole study case
The Case: In 2016, the Sandy City, Utah city council adopted an ordinance making it illegal for any person “to sit or stand, in or on any unpaved median, or any median of fewer than 36 inches for any period of time.” Sandy City Traffic Code, Article 16, Section 299.1 (the Ordinance). After the Sandy City council adopted the Ordinance, PlaintiffAppellant Steve Ray Evans received four citations for violating the Ordinance when he stood on narrow or unpaved medians. Evans filed suit against the City and many of its officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the district court of Utah, alleging the Ordinance is facially invalid because it violates the First Amendment right to free speech. Evans also asked the district court to grant his request for a preliminary injunction. I need a writer to help me write an opinion on this case using at least 3 legal test to justify your opinion on the ruling whether you believe Sandy City infringed on Evan’s First Amendment. Please do not paraphrase from judge BRISCOE, BALDOCK’s opinion.
The links are (https://math.dartmouth.edu/~prob/prob/prob.pdf), (http://www.ams.org/publicoutreach/feature-column/fcarc-pagerank)
The Case: In 2016, the Sandy City, Utah city council adopted an ordinance making it illegal for any person “to sit or stand, in or on any unpaved median, or any median of fewer than 36 inches for any period of time.” Sandy City Traffic Code, Article 16, Section 299.1 (the Ordinance). After the Sandy City council adopted the Ordinance, PlaintiffAppellant Steve Ray Evans received four citations for violating the Ordinance when he stood on narrow or unpaved medians. Evans filed suit against the City and many of its officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the district court of Utah, alleging the Ordinance is facially invalid because it violates the First Amendment right to free speech. Evans also asked the district court to grant his request for a preliminary injunction. I need a writer to help me write an opinion on this case using at least 3 legal test to justify your opinion on the ruling whether you believe Sandy City infringed on Evan’s First Amendment. Please do not paraphrase from judge BRISCOE, BALDOCK’s opinion.
1. Summary—In THREE sentences, tell me what is the author’s (or documentarian’s) key argument? What did you learn from the reading(s)? For example, what are the essential concepts, ideas, and insights?
2. Analysis—Discuss at least TWO issues that caught your attention while you were reading. For example, what is missing from the readings/are there questions the readings leave unanswered? What “works” for you? What doesn’t work for you? How do the readings further elaborate or support one another? Or, how do they contradict or undermine one another?
3. Discussion Questions—Write ONE question based on your summary and analysis. This question should illustrate the contributions and limitations of the readings.
Another material is a video, the link is here
https://www.kanopy.com/product/race
-Ramsey, A & Montgomery, K. (2014). Technology-based intervention in social work practice.
-Ted Talk- 2016. An Interview with the Founders of Black Lives Matter Movement.
Read the following opinion article published online in The McGill Journal of Political Studies.
Write a 400-500 word essay-style response with a thesis that addresses these connected questions:
What have your thoughts been on racism and systemic racism with regards to the COVID-19 epidemic in Canada? Reflecting on your thoughts, what do you notice about (a) the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on racialized communities (b) bias and stereotypes in the Canadian health care system (c) whether or not it is necessary and important to collect data that tracks race and socio-demographic information OR (d) personal experience (or experiences of family members) of racism and/or systemic racism during the pandemic?
To answer this, think about what you have thought, felt and experienced while being in this unusual time and how it has been different or similar from previous experiences. To help keep your response focused, choose just ONE of the (a) – (d) options given in the question.
1. Read and study the attached case and complete the questions at the end of the study. Use the case study
outline below to assist you with your analysis. Questions should be answered using case study format. Ensure
that you adequately explain the problem, describe alternative solutions and justify your recommendation. This
exercise should be able to be completed in approximately 3-6 doubled space pages. Attached completed Case
Study #1 as a MS Word document in the assignment area of the classroom – Case Study #1.
OUTLINE FOR CASE ANALYSIS
Title Page (APA formatted)
Case Name:
I. Major Facts
(State here the major facts as you see them. Make statements clear and concise for your own understanding
as well as for the understanding of the other students and the instructor.)
II. Major Problem
(State here the major problem as you see it. Emphasize the present major problem. You may wish to phrase
your statement in the form of a question. In a few cases, there may be more than one major problem. A good
problem statement will be concise, usually only one sentence.)
III. Possible Solutions
A. (List here the possible solutions to the major problem. Let your imagination come up with alternative ways to
solve the problem.
B. Do not limit yourself to only one or two possible solutions. These solutions should be distinct from each
other.
C. However, you may wish to include portions of one solution in another solution, as long as each solution
stands alone. Only in this manner will your subsequent choice be definitive.
D. Briefly note advantages and disadvantages of each possible solution.)
etc.
IV. Choice and Rationale
(State here your choice, A or B or ___ and the detailed reasons for your choice. You may also state your
reasons for not choosing the other alternative solutions.)
V. Implementation
(Prepare a plan to implement your choice)
Appendix (Answer case study questions)
Reference Page (APA formatted)