Skip to content
What is cultural relativism? What is ethical relativism? What, if any, is the relationship between the two?
Do people outside of a culture have the right to criticize that culture’s values or beliefs? Why or why not?
Think of a strong example of a cultural practice. For example, say another culture practices child marriages. What would a cultural relativist say about this? What would an ethical relativist say about it? Support your answer.
•Discuss the three things that would follow if cultural relativism were accurate, and what difficulties would arise as a result of each consequence.
•What is natural law theory? Be sure to discuss its origins in Aristotle, the tension between what ought to be and what is, and its contrast to the contemporary scientific worldview.
•Discuss the difficulties in using religion as a basis for ethics in the context of scripture and church tradition.
•Discuss the three things that would follow if cultural relativism were accurate, and what difficulties would arise as a result of each consequence.
•What is natural law theory? Be sure to discuss its origins in Aristotle, the tension between what ought to be and what is, and its contrast to the contemporary scientific worldview.
•Discuss the difficulties in using religion as a basis for ethics in the context of scripture and church tradition.
explore cultural relativism. This one will require deep pondering. You begin by asking yourself if there are certain absolute rights and wrongs. Then consider if you have ever violated an absolute wrong? How do you KNOW that something is absolutely wrong? By what standard do you judge others actions?
Remember applied ethics? Let’s explore some case studies so you can practice applying what you have learned.
First, we need to establish some assumptions:
· You have established what is right and wrong for yourself
· You have based your belief about what is right and wrong in such things as religion, education, humanism
· One of those beliefs is “killing is wrong.” You could never kill. This belief is NOT relative to a culture or situation; it is an absolute metaethical wrong.
Case Study #1
You study the Inuit culture and find that the elderly would be stabbed or left to freeze on ice flows. Death occurs swiftly. You think how barbaric this was and judge the culture as such. Now consider the way many elderly die in the U.S. today: confused, moaning, incontinent in diapers, a slow, agonizing death, perhaps being tube fed and given medications to prolong life. How would the Inuit of the day view our culture from this lens?
Case Study #2
You are studying ethics in war. You are not concerned about killing in war. War has different rules. Killing is OK in war. You HAVE to kill to be in war. Watch the trailer for Hacksaw Ridge. Private Doss participated in war yet held to his ethical beliefs. He did not kill, he saved, at great personal risk. Does this now mean that killing during war is wrong? Does it mean that killing during war is right? Does it support that everything is relative to our cultural beliefs?
Case Study #3
Lawrence Franks (84) promised his wife, suffering with dementia, that he would never put her in a nursing home. Lawrence lovingly cared for his wife for years until her condition became too serious, and he was unable to properly care for her. He felt that she was suffering. He then killed his 86-year-old wife to fulfill his promise. He was charged with murder. (https://www.foxnews.com/world/elderly-man-beat-dementia-stricken-wife-to-death-in-mercy-killing). Is Mr. Franks guilty of murder?
Case Study #4
Jungdan Chow and his family have a tradition passed down for generations. The entire family would go to the markets to pick out dinner. This was a very special dinner as delicacies they could not typically afford were carefully chosen and prepared. Even the young children could sense the excitement in the air as they strolled through the market. Bat and fresh, boiled dog, were chosen that day and they hurried home to begin the feast, feeling connected to their ancestors by hundreds of years of tradition.
…wet markets are the predominant food retail outlets for fresh produce and meat in Chinese cities. They have very few supermarkets…. hedgehogs and peacocks and wild rabbits and snakes, deer; crocodiles as well. Many of these wild animals, they’re not necessarily caught in the wild – right? – so they can be farmed animals. They’re just exotic food that’s not very commonly found. Eating wild animal is considered a symbol of wealth because they are rarer and more expensive. And wild animals are also considered more natural and, thus, nutritious, compared to farmed meat. It’s a belief in traditional Chinese medicine that it can boost the immune system.
Excerpted from: https://www.npr.org/2020/01/22/798644707/why-wet-markets-persisted-in-china-despite-disease-and-hygiene-concerns
Express your thoughts on cultural relativism.
Include the following aspects in the assignment:
· How would you judge right and wrong from different cultural perspectives and different situations?
· When making an ethical decision that will impact others, how would you assure that you are not viewing right and wrong from the perspective that only your culture knows?
Link to article: https://iep.utm.edu/moral-re/#SH3c
Select just one topic. 1. Visit the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy found here (Links to an external site.). Pick one of the arguments from section 3 and present it. Then, determine what James Rachels and Ray Prebble might say about it. Which argument do you think better lives up to the standards of philosophy? (You may also want to look at further discussion of moral relativism found here (Links to an external site.).) Cite all the texts you employ. This is a 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more. In offering your own judgment and defense, use course concepts. Grading Rubric 1. Does this paper identify have a clear thesis? (5%) 2. Does this paper contain only relevant information? Are the citations completed properly? (5%) 3. Does the paper attribute the correct view to the philosophers in question? (10%) 4. Is/are the philosopher’s view presented with the appropriate level of detail? (For example, does the author explain concepts and arguments in a tight manner, or are the arguments and concepts merely sketched?) (25%) 5. Does the author present a clear argument in his/her discussion? (15%) 6. Does the paper cohere? Or, is the paper a hodgepodge of disparate ideas? (10%) 7. Does the conclusion tie together the different phases of the paper? Or, is the conclusion a non-sequitur? (5%) 8. Are the spelling, grammar and syntax on the college level? (5%) 9. Does the author make appropriate and accurate use of course concepts in constructing his or her discussion?
What is “cultural relativism” and how might it affect ethnocentrism? Give examples and describe the benefits of
how you might employ cultural relativism in your life.
Discuss your thoughts about cultural relativism. Are there some values which are universal? Or should everyone have the freedom to choose his/ her own values.