Watch the short videos posted for the week and write a half of a page addressing the issues. What can law enforcement do to combat the crime spikes we are seeing across the U.S.?
Tag: Criminal Law
Criminal law
Watch the short videos posted for the week and write a half of a page addressing the issues. What can law enforcement do to combat the crime spikes we are seeing across the U.S.?
Criminal law, not criminal procedure
Read the prompt, review the case, and then decide whether you would accept or reject the case if you were the lawyer.
You are an expert in criminal law, not criminal procedure. Would you accept or reject this case? Read People v. Wrotten, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 04501 (2010). The case is available at this link: http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-first-department/2010/2010-04501.htmlLinks to an external site.
Criminal law, not civil litigation
Read the prompt, review the case, and then decide whether you would accept or reject the case if you were the lawyer
You are an expert in criminal law, not civil litigation. Would you accept or reject this case? Read Cetacean Community v. Bush, 386 F.3d 1169 (9th Cir. 2004). The case is available at this link: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14748284771413043760&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarrLinks to an external site..
Criminal Law
Cases involving sexual abuse of children pose a special problem for a proportionality analysis under the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual
Punishment Clause. Such crimes inflict the immediate damage of the criminal conduct, but also the likelihood of lifetime emotional injury. On the other hand,
a crime of “offensive touching” a child is not the same as rape or murder of that child. In Hanf v. State, 182 S0. 2d 704 (Fla. App. 2015) the defendant was
sentenced to life in prison for lewd and lascivious molestation of a child under 12 years of age. (Florida has eliminated parole for most crimes.) The criminal
conduct was “unwanted touching” of the child’s breast. The appeals court affirmed the sentence, holding that it was not “grossly disproportionate” to the
crime. What are the relevant facts to consider when making such a determination? Is the dissent correct?
Criminal Law
You are a 20-year-old college freshman. You just left a party at two o’clock in the morning. At the party, you
drank four beers and smoked two marijuana joints. As you are driving home, you feel “buzzed, but not drunk.”
A police officer stops you and states that he witnessed you driving erratically. The police officer asks you if you
have had any alcohol to drink and you state that you are not drunk, but drank one or two beers in the
afternoon.
Based on your behavior and statements, the police officer arrests you and then tells you that you need to
submit to a breath test. The breath test taken five hours after the arrest indicates that your blood alcohol level
is just under the legal limit. Not satisfied with the breath test results, the police officer continues his
interrogation.
During this interrogation, you admit that you consumed four beers and smoked two marijuana joints within an
hour of your arrest. Based on your statements, the police officer charges you with driving while intoxicated (a
misdemeanor offense). At no time during the arrest and interrogation does the police officer provide you with
your Miranda rights.
Because you aspire to attend law school, you decide to fight the charges. At the trial, you argue that the police
officer violated Miranda’s clear directives. In response, the prosecutor argues that you made all of your
statements voluntarily and not under duress. Additionally, the prosecutor argues that Miranda rights do not
extend to misdemeanor crimes.
1. How do you think that the judge will rule on your motion? When answering this question, please review the
summary of the Berghuis v. Thompkins where the Supreme Court considered the position of a suspect who
understands his or her right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona and is aware he or she has the right to
remain silent, but does not explicitly invoke or waive the right. How does this case and/ or other relevant case
law impact the judge’s ruling on your motion?
2. Note that it is estimated that about 75% of suspects routinely waive their Miranda rights and talk to the
police.1 Do you believe that this suspects are willingly waiving their rights with a full understanding of the rights
they are waiving? Why or why not? How can we as a society do better to ensure people are willingly either
invoking or waiving their rights? How can we assist law enforcement in their work in doing so?
Criminal law
After reading this case: http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/04/08/teens.life.sentence/index.html?iref=topnews. Discuss your thoughts in terms of the following: What
http://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/parole_probation/parole_board_considerations.htm should a http://pardonandparole.uslegal.com/scope-of-parole-power/factors/
consider when it evaluates a prisoner for release?