Article analysis

 

 

 

Students have to find and choose a current development that is relevant to the assigned topic. These may be drawn from periodicals (including electronic periodicals) such as the Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Business Week, the Economist, the New York Times, etc. They should not be older than 6 months.
In the current development (about 2 solid paragraphs long), you should briefly discuss:
Key facts discussed in the article
How the article is related to class material using concepts discussed in class

 

 

 

 

Article Analysis

 

 

 

 

1. First, you must slowly and closely read (or if a/v, watch or isten to) each assigned text, and vigorously
annotate (highlight, and underline key points and your thoughts on these key points) as you do so.
2. Second, you must go back to your annotations, and pull out the most important quotes (those which
illuminate the author’s main points) and type them out (appropriately, with quotation marks). In your homework
assignment, bold these quotes, so that they are distinguishable from your interpretations.
3. Third, underneath each bolded quote that you type out, you must include your own interpretation of the
meaning of each key quote, in your own words.

 

Article Analysis

 

 

 

 

The article posted below is an excellent example of ANOVA as well as the use of an index comprised of
several variables. The index used is the Index of African Governance, alsoAdd New known as the Ibrahim Index of
African Governance (IIAG) and the Youtube video (also posted below) gives a good explanation of this index.
Your assignment is to review both the article and the Youtube video and then use a similar approach to create
a mini-index of two of the pillars of public administration. The pillars that we discuss in public administration are
constructs or concepts that may mean different things to different people. If you are to use them in research
you need to define them in a way that they can be operationalized. Your conceptual definitions should have at
least three dimensions that can be operationalized (measured), and at least one of your indices should be
informed by a Christian worldview.

http://iresearcher.org/IR%20Template%20-%20Sow.pdf
http://jibe-net.com/journals/jibe/Vol_2_No_4_December_2014/6.pdf

 

Article Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Introduction
The introduction should briefly place the study in a broad context and highlight why it is important. It should define the purpose of the work and its significance. The current state of the research field should be reviewed carefully and key publications cited. Please highlight controversial and diverging hypotheses when necessary. Finally, briefly mention the main aim of the work and highlight the principal conclusions. As far as possible, please keep the introduction comprehensible to scientists outside your particular field of research. References should be numbered in order of appearance and indicated by a numeral or numerals in square brackets, e.g., [1] or [2,3], or [4–6]. See the end of the document for further details on references.
2. Materials and Methods
Materials and Methods should be described with sufficient details to allow others to replicate and build on published results. Please note that publication of your manuscript implicates that you must make all materials, data, computer code, and protocols associated with the publication available to readers. Please disclose at the submission stage any restrictions on the availability of materials or information. New methods and protocols should be described in detail while well-established methods can be briefly described and appropriately cited.
Research manuscripts reporting large datasets that are deposited in a publicly available database should specify where the data have been deposited and provide the relevant accession numbers. If the accession numbers have not yet been obtained at the time of submission, please state that they will be provided during review. They must be provided prior to publication.
Interventionary studies involving animals or humans, and other studies require ethical approval must list the authority that provided approval and the corresponding ethical approval code.
3. Results
This section may be divided by subheadings. It should provide a concise and precise description of the experimental results, their interpretation as well as the experimental conclusions that can be drawn.
3.1. Subsection
3.1.1. Subsubsection
Bulleted lists look like this:
• First bullet
• Second bullet
• Third bullet
Numbered lists can be added as follows:
1. First item
2. Second item
3. Third item
The text continues here.
3.2. Figures, Tables and Schemes
All figures and tables should be cited in the main text as Figure 1, Table 1, etc.

(a)
(b)
Figure 1. This is a figure, Schemes follow the same formatting. If there are multiple panels, they should be listed as: (a) Description of what is contained in the first panel; (b) Description of what is contained in the second panel. Figures should be placed in the main text near to the first time they are cited. A caption on a single line should be centered.
Table 1. This is a table. Tables should be placed in the main text near to the first time they are cited.
Title 1 Title 2 Title 3
entry 1 data data
entry 2 data data 1
1 Tables may have a footer.
3.3. Formatting of Mathematical Components
This is an example of an equation:
a = 1, (1)
the text following an equation need not be a new paragraph. Please punctuate equations as regular text.
4. Discussion
Authors should discuss the results and how they can be interpreted in perspective of previous studies and of the working hypotheses. The findings and their implications should be discussed in the broadest context possible. Future research directions may also be highlighted.
5. Conclusions
This section is not mandatory, but can be added to the manuscript if the discussion is unusually long or complex.
6. Patents
This section is not mandatory, but may be added if there are patents resulting from the work reported in this manuscript.
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1, Figure S1: title, Table S1: title, Video S1: title.
Author Contributions: For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions must be provided. The following statements should be used “Conceptualization, X.X. and Y.Y.; methodology, X.X.; software, X.X.; validation, X.X., Y.Y. and Z.Z.; formal analysis, X.X.; investigation, X.X.; resources, X.X.; data curation, X.X.; writing—original draft preparation, X.X.; writing—review and editing, X.X.; visualization, X.X.; supervision, X.X.; project administration, X.X.; funding acquisition, Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.”, please turn to the CRediT taxonomy for the term explanation. Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to the work reported.
Funding: Please add: “This research received no external funding” or “This research was funded by NAME OF FUNDER, grant number XXX” and “The APC was funded by XXX”. Check carefully that the details given are accurate and use the standard spelling of funding agency names at https://search.crossref.org/funding, any errors may affect your future funding.
Acknowledgments: In this section you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).
Conflicts of Interest: Declare conflicts of interest or state “The authors declare no conflict of interest.” Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interest that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results. Any role of the funders in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results must be declared in this section. If there is no role, please state “The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results”.
Appendix A
The appendix is an optional section that can contain details and data supplemental to the main text. For example, explanations of experimental details that would disrupt the flow of the main text, but nonetheless remain crucial to understanding and reproducing the research shown; figures of replicates for experiments of which representative data is shown in the main text can be added here if brief, or as Supplementary data. Mathematical proofs of results not central to the paper can be added as an appendix.

Appendix B
All appendix sections must be cited in the main text. In the appendixes, Figures, Tables, etc. should be labeled starting with ‘A’, e.g., Figure A1, Figure A2, etc.
References
References must be numbered in order of appearance in the text (including citations in tables and legends) and listed individually at the end of the manuscript. We recommend preparing the references with a bibliography software package, such as EndNote, ReferenceManager or Zotero to avoid typing mistakes and duplicated references. Include the digital object identifier (DOI) for all references where available.

Citations and References in Supplementary files are permitted provided that they also appear in the reference list here.

In the text, reference numbers should be placed in square brackets [ ], and placed before the punctuation; for example [1], [1–3] or [1,3]. For embedded citations in the text with pagination, use both parentheses and brackets to indicate the reference number and page numbers; for example [5] (p. 10), or [6] (pp. 101–105).

1. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D. Title of the article. Abbreviated Journal Name Year, Volume, page range.
2. Author 1, A.; Author 2, B. Title of the chapter. In Book Title, 2nd ed.; Editor 1, A., Editor 2, B., Eds.; Publisher: Publisher Location, Country, 2007; Volume 3, pp. 154–196.
3. Author 1, A.; Author 2, B. Book Title, 3rd ed.; Publisher: Publisher Location, Country, 2008; pp. 154–196.
4. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C. Title of Unpublished Work. Abbreviated Journal Name stage of publication
(under review; accepted; in press).
5. Author 1, A.B. (University, City, State, Country); Author 2, C. (Institute, City, State, Country). Personal communication, 2012.
6. Author 1, A.B.; Author 2, C.D.; Author 3, E.F. Title of Presentation. In Title of the Collected Work (if available), Proceedings of the Name of the Conference, Location of Conference, Country, Date of Conference; Editor 1, Editor 2, Eds. (if available); Publisher: City, Country, Year (if available); Abstract Number (optional), Pagination (optional).
7. Author 1, A.B. Title of Thesis. Level of Thesis, Degree-Granting University, Location of University, Date of Completion.
8. Title of Site. Available online: URL (accessed on Day Month Year).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
© 2020 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article analysis

 

 

Select an article from the articles posted on CULearn. These pieces deal with the controversies surrounding the influence that media have over their audiences. If you prefer to find another article yourself, you must email it to me for approval before using it in your analysis. Analyze the article using the course material we’ve discussed so far in class. What concerns are being expressed? How is the audience understood and positioned? What kind of model of communication is it proposing (e.g. the hypodermic model, two-step flow of communication, or something more complex) and why? Can you identify any parallels or similarities to concerns expressed in relation to other or earlier forms of media?

 

Article Analysis

 

will create a presentation to defend or argue against reading a particular American novel. The presentation should be made as if addressing the board of education. Your selection should come from books that are typically included on the “frequently challenged books” list.

Research and presentations should cover, at minimum, the following subjects:

$ Brief biography of the author
$ Discussion of work – not just a summary, but brief analysis
$ Why is work typically challenged?
$ Significance or not of author and/or work, both socially and historically – why should we or should we not be reading the work?

 

 

Article Analysis

 

 

https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/apc/ap03_frq_english_lang_23013.pdf

Essay Prompt Reminders:

• Read the prompt carefully. Make sure you answer the key question being asked in the prompt.
• Read and annotate the given passage carefully.
• Spend 5–7 minutes planning your response before you begin the actual essay in order to organize your ideas efficiently.
• Craft a well-organized and well-developed essay. Your essay must have a strong introduction with a solid thesis; a body that uses topic sentences, transitions, and relevant textual evidence to support the thesis; and a meaningful conclusion.
• Analyze—do not summarize. For example, do not simply identify a metaphor and summarize what it means. Explain why the author chose to use it and how it achieves the author’s purpose.
• Use precise diction and active voice for clarity.
• Vary your sentence structure to add interest and show a command of language.
• Stick to an objective, scholarly third-person point of view (unless the use of first-person or second-person point of view is a rhetorical strategy on your part).

 

 

Article Analysis

Part I asks you to read four passages from our reading and then to identify the author, work, character(s), and situation. Next, you will be asked to respond to two analytical questions about each excerpt.
A. The manuscript pages were heaped in random order in the mute girl’s attic quarters. These flimsy pages represented Kien’s past; the lines told stories that were sometimes clear, but most were at best obscure and as vague and pale as twilight. They told stories from the precariously fine border dividing life from death, blurring the line itself and finally erasing it. Ages and times were mixed in confusion, as were peace and war.

1. Identify the author, work, character(s), and situation. (Three points)

 

2. How does this passage comment on the structure of the novel in which it appears? Provide an example from the novel of the novel’s unusual structure. (Eight points)

 

 

3. What role does the deaf-mute woman play in this novel, and why is it important that she is deaf and mute? In what ways is she allegorical? (Eight points)

 

B. The bag of ice slipped in my arms. I leaned down to catch it and as I pulled it closer to me, I thought I felt my brother’s breath upon me. This was not the warmth I’d felt earlier, but a chill now at the center of my spine. The feeling was so confusing and frightening, I ran.
,

1. Identify the author, work, character(s), and situation. (Three points)

 

 

2. Why does the narrator feel her brother’s presence at this moment? Why doesn’t she fully mourn or even acknowledge his loss before this incident? (Eight points).

 

 

 

 

 

3. How does the narrator’s tendency to become her lost brother affect her gender identify? NB: Gender identify is the sense of being a man or a woman or non-binary. A strong answer will quote a scene to back up your point. (Eight points)

 

 

 

 

C. He left the door and came back to Kien, putting out his hand to pull him up. “Be quick. What the hell are you doin?’ We’ve got to get to the shelter. Listen, I was only going to screw her until Vinh. You could have her back after that. Hell, you’re really soft. A little bourgeois softie, aren’t you?”

1. Identify the author, text, characters, and situation. (Three points)

 

 

2. What are two aspects of this speech and the actions preceding it that probably offended the Vietnamese Communist officials who banned this novel? Why would they find these elements offensive? You may use bullet points. (Eight points)

 

 

 

 

 

3. How do the incidents occurring right after this scene change the protagonist’s relationship with his girlfriend? Be specific. (Eight points)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lit 237 4 Mid-term

D. I walked the three long blocks down Orange to Euclid. The liquor store was on the corner. The screen door was closed and the store looked dark. I stepped into the cool and quiet inside. There was a tall man with thick hair standing behind the counter. He had a newspaper open across the counter and was leaning over it, reading. As I walked by him, he looked up and said, “Hi, there.” I turned my head toward him and said, “Hi, there,” in the same tone of voice. Then I laughed to myself, thinking, You bird. You parrot. You Polly. I mouthed the words Polly, Polly, Polly, as I walked between the tall shelves of bottles, making my way slowly toward the freezers at the back of the store.

1. Identify the author, text, characters, and situation. (Three points)

 

 

2. This passage features a newspaper and is about literacy. What does this excerpt indicate about the narrator’s complicated attitude toward learning English and becoming Americanized? (Eight points)

 

 

 

 

3. What are two other moments in the novel when the narrator discusses the process of becoming literate in English? You may use bullet points. (Eight points)

 

EXTRA CREDIT: What are the “Three Don’ts” of Vietnamese Communism (consult The Sorrow of War)

 

EXTRA EXTRA CREDIT. For the two daily edits, type out the sentences correctly, fixing the punctuation. (Two points each)
1. Koala bears are not actually bears, rather they are marsupials.

2. My favorite Mediterranean spread is hummus it is very garlicky.

 

EXTRA EXTRA EXTRA CREDIT: Why do you think Le Thi Diem Thuy named her novel The Gangster We Are All Looking For? In other words, what does this title mean, in the context of the novel? Please, no Internet balderdash: I’m looking for YOUR interpretation. (Seven points)

 

 

 

Article Analysis

The article posted below is an excellent example of ANOVA as well as the use of an index comprised of
several variables. The index used is the Index of African Governance, also known as the Ibrahim Index of
African Governance (IIAG) and the Youtube video (also posted below) gives a good explanation of this index.
Your assignment is to review both the article and the Youtube video and then use a similar approach to create
a mini-index of two of the pillars of public administration. The pillars that we discuss in public administration are
constructs or concepts that may mean different things to different people. If you are to use them in research
you need to define them in a way that they can be operationalized. Your conceptual definitions should have at
least three dimensions that can be operationalized (measured), and at least one of your indices should be
informed by a Christian worldview.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPlNIs2K5gs
http://iresearcher.org/IR%20Template%20-%20Sow.pdf
http://jibe-net.com/journals/jibe/Vol_2_No_4_December_2014/6.pdf