After reading the information on the Ramirez case, and with the information that you have learned throughout the class, please post a synopsis of the Ramirez case. This should include all the relavent evidence some details about what happened in the crime scene and trials, and then how you feel about the courts decisions regarding the tool mark evidence. Please support your opinions, they should be based on information you have learned about the Daubert/Fry process (remember that Florida was a Fry state at the time of this case) and also on the information that you have learned about impression evidence. Feel free to research additional articles, but remember to only quote reliable sources (scientist for scientific matters, lawyers for judicial matters, etc.).