Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
As you learned in this unit, a Rogerian argument is one that presents two sides of a debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given the two articles linked below that present opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools vs. some kind of ‘dress code’), construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a concrete, workable solution or “middle ground.”
Sample Answer
Rogerian Argument Essay: Finding a Middle Ground on Mandatory School Uniforms
Introduction
In the ongoing debate over mandatory school uniforms versus a more flexible dress code, two articles present opposing views. “The Case for School Uniforms” by Andrea Anderson argues in favor of uniforms, highlighting their potential benefits for students’ safety, discipline, and equality. On the other hand, “Dress Codes vs. Freedom of Expression” by David Deane emphasizes the importance of individuality and self-expression, suggesting that a dress code would be a more appropriate compromise. In this essay, we will explore a middle-ground solution that acknowledges the concerns raised by both sides.
Thesis Statement: While mandatory school uniforms can foster a sense of unity and safety, a flexible dress code that balances individual expression and modesty is a more practical solution that satisfies both perspectives.
Body Paragraphs
Pro-Uniform Rationales
In her article, Anderson provides several rationales in favor of mandatory school uniforms. She argues that uniforms create a sense of belonging and unity among students, fostering a positive school culture (Anderson, 2018). Furthermore, uniforms can help reduce distractions and prevent discrimination based on clothing choices. By eliminating visible branding or designer labels, uniforms promote equality among students (Anderson, 2018).
Anti-Uniform/Pro-Dress Code Rationales
Deane’s article highlights the importance of freedom of expression and individuality. He suggests that a dress code that sets guidelines for appropriate attire can address concerns related to distractions and inappropriate clothing choices (Deane, 2019). A dress code allows students to express their personal style while maintaining a respectful and professional appearance.
Comparison and Contrast
Both articles acknowledge the need for a balance between promoting unity and individual expression. While Anderson argues for the adoption of mandatory uniforms, Deane proposes a more flexible dress code. A critical comparison reveals that both sides share concerns about distractions, discrimination, and student safety. However, they differ in their approach to addressing these issues. Anderson believes that uniforms are the best solution, while Deane argues for a dress code that gives students more freedom.
Conclusion
To address the concerns raised by both sides of the debate on mandatory school uniforms, a middle-ground solution is necessary. A flexible dress code that sets guidelines for appropriate attire while allowing students to express their individuality can strike the right balance. This approach promotes unity among students while safeguarding their freedom of expression and maintaining a respectful learning environment. By adopting a dress code that emphasizes modesty and professionalism, schools can satisfy both perspectives and create an inclusive atmosphere.
In conclusion, finding a middle ground on the issue of mandatory school uniforms is crucial to satisfy both sides of the debate. By acknowledging the benefits of unity and safety that uniforms can provide while also respecting individual expression and self-identity through a flexible dress code, schools can strike a balance that meets the needs of all stakeholders.
Reflection
The Rogerian model of argument helps us better understand the topic by forcing us to consider opposing viewpoints. It encourages us to acknowledge the concerns and perspectives of both sides, fostering empathy and understanding. This approach is beneficial because it promotes open dialogue, prevents polarization, and increases the chances of finding common ground.
The Rogerian approach can help gain insight into my own argumentative essay by encouraging me to critically analyze opposing viewpoints. By considering alternative perspectives, I can strengthen my argument by addressing potential counterarguments and finding ways to incorporate elements from opposing views into my proposed solution. This approach fosters a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and strengthens the overall effectiveness of my argument.
