Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Case study, , 2000 words, 75% of the total grade. Students write an individual about an infringement of any kind of IP-protected innovation of one firm by another firm. How have both firms operated, legally and strategically? How has the case affected the subsequent strategy of each firm, if at all (in which case: why not?)? And how has the case affected industry structure and dynamics? Marking criteria: Please see Appendix-B Marking Descriptor for Coursework in module handbook. PLEASE NOTE that in their individual coursework, a student should mention explicitly what the choice of firm/product was that their group for group presentations opted for. If a student has chosen different firms/products, this should be reflected in a mark that is higher than it would otherwise be. Intellectual property Reading List Kun Fu Loughborough University Bigger Smaller Feedback Help Search Login ExportFilterHighlightCollapse all Main readings. Session 1: Introduction to Intellectual Property Book Chapter SCOTCHMER, S., MAURER, S.M. A primer for non-lawyers on Intellectual property. Chapter 3 In: SCOTCHMER, Suzanne. 2004. Innovation and incentives. MIT Press. pp. 65-95 e-Resource Session 2: Patents & Copyright Electronic Resource RIVETTE, K.G, NOTHHAFT, H.R., KLINE, D. 2000. Discovering New Value in Intellectual Property. e-Resource Electronic Resource DEPARTMENT of Commerce Internet Policy Task Force. 2013. Copyright policy, creativity, and innovation in the digital economy (Green paper). e-Resource Session 3: IP Licensing & Valuation Book Chapter Licensing and related transactions. Chapter 7 In: FRANK, Steven J.. 2012. Intellectual property for managers and investors : a guide to evaluating, protecting and exploiting IP. Cambridge University Press. pp. 139-165 Note: Athens username & password required for digital access. e-Resource Session 4: IP, Entrepreneurship & Innovation Article LEIPONEN, A., BYMA, J., 2009. If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies. Research Policy, 38(9), 1478-1488. e-Resource Article BITTLINGMAYER, G., 1988. Property Rights, Progress, and the Aircraft Patent Agreement. Journal of Law and Economics, 31(1), 227-248. e-Resource Article MCGAHAN, A.M., 2006. Profiting from technological innovation by others: The effect of competitor patenting on firm value. Research policy, 35(8), 1222–1242. e-Resource Session 5: Trade secrets & Know-how Article VON Hippel, Eric., 1987. Cooperation between rivals: Informal know-how trading. Research policy, 16(6), 291-302. e-Resource Article REID, G. C., SEARLE, N., VISHNUBHAKAT, S., 2014. What’s it worth to keep a secret?. Duke law & technology review (Online), 13(1), 116-161. e-Resource Article HANNAH, David R., 2005. Should I Keep a Secret? The Effects of Trade Secret Protection Procedures on Employees’ Obligations to Protect Trade Secrets. Organization science, 16(1), 71-84. e-Resource Session 6: Search and Use IPRs Information Article GRILICHES, Z., 1990. Patent Statistics as economic indicators : A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4):, 1661-1707. e-Resource Article ERNST, Holger., 2003-09. Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233-242. e-Resource Electronic Resource WORLD Intellectual Property Organization. WIPO Guide to Using Patent Information. e-Resource Session 7: Strategic Management of IP Article SOMAYA, D., 2012. Patent Strategy and Management. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1084-1114. e-Resource Article DOLFSMA, W., 2011. Patent strategizing. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(2), 168-178. e-Resource Book Chapter GRANSTRAND, O. Chapters 6-9 In: GRANSTRAND, Ove. 2000. The economics and management of intellectual property : towards intellectual capitalism. Edward Elgar. pp. 176-317 Note: Chapter 8 (pp. 256-288) available online. e-Resource Session 8: Guest lecture Article ROSATI, Eleonora., 2017-03-16. Intermediary IP injunctions in the EU and UK experiences: when less (harmonization) is more?. Journal of intellectual property law & practice, 12(4), 338-350. e-Resource Electronic Resource Mini case study – C-324/09 – L’Oréal and Others. e-Resource Session 9 No reading Suggested additional Readings and References Additional Article ARUNDEL, A., 2001. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation. Research policy, 30(4), 611–624.. e-Resource Article BOS, B., 2015. A dynamic view on secrecy management. Journal of business research, 68(12), 2619-2627. e-Resource Additional Article DOLFSMA, W., 2006. IPRs, Technological Development and Economic Development. Journal of economic issues, 40(2), 333-342. e-Resource Book Chapter DOLFSMA, W. Patents and copyrights In: 2008. International Encyclopedia of Public Policy. GPERU. pp. 498-503 Note: entry available on module Learn page – see lecturer for details. e-Resource Additional Article GRILICHES, Z., 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators : a survey. The Journal of economic literature, 28(4), 1661-1707. e-Resource Additional Article HELPMAN, E., 1993. Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights. Econometrica, 61(6), 1247-1280. e-Resource Additional Article HETTINGER, E.C., 1989. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy and public affairs, 18(1), 31–52. Additional Book LEV, Baruch., 2001. Intangibles : management, measurement and reporting. Brookings Institution Press. e-Resource Additional Book SCHMIDT, A. H. J., DOLFSMA, Wilfred, KEUVELAAR, Wim., c2007. Fighting the war on file sharing. T.M.C Asser. Article TEECE, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research policy, 15(6), 285-305. e-Resource Additional Book TOWSE., 2002. Economics of Intellectual Property – 4 vol. set. Additional Book VON Hippel, Eric., 1988. The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press. Electronic Resource IPO. 2015. Intellectual Property Office. e-Resource Electronic Resource EPO. 2015. European Patent Office. e-Resource Electronic Resource USPTO. 2015. United States Patent and Trademark Office. e-Resource Electronic Resource SIPO. 2015. State Intellectual Property Office (P.R. China). e-Resource
1 similar rate low than 5% 100% original
2 not out of topic
3 no mistake in Grammar
4 no format problem
5 no sources/citations issues ( all reference has in-text reference , all in-text reference put in reference list)
6 Word count enough
7 add table of content match subtitle
8 add introduction conclusion
9 add abstract
10 add recommendation
11 Instruction fully covered
12 Paper not lacks proper research
13 not Wrong data/statistics/calculations present
14 more refrence
15 require rich graphs, tables and/or charts to enrich paper
16 extension revision in 14days
17 sign high level top 10writer
18 The first name in topic is school name do nor sign same writer in one school
19 make sure 100% pass
20 reference is academic
