Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Essay Question: Are coercive powers or ethical interviewing techniques the solution to gaining greater quality and quantity of information? Rationale This will allow the student to research investigative interviewing practice world-wide and discuss how such practice effects the quality and quantity of information gained during an investigation. Marking criteria Analysis Analysis not present (0 marks) Analysis inappropriate (3 marks) Analysis appropriate but poorly described (6 marks) Analysis appropriate but containing flaws which invalidate some conclusions (8 marks) Analysis appropriate (15 marks) Research No evidence of research presented (0 marks) Some evidence of research (3 marks) Evidence of research and authorities correctly cited (5 marks) Evidence of research well beyond the suggested readings and authorities correctly cited (15 marks) Use of CSU library resources Not used (0 marks) Used, but not effectively (2 marks) Used effectively (5 marks) Structure/Visual presentation/Style Unstructured (0 marks) Structured inappropriately (1 mark) Structured appropriately and professionally presented (3 marks) Level of detail Major sections not present and/or contains large unnecessary sections (0 marks) Some minor omissions and/or contains some unnecessary detail (1 mark) Comprehensive yet contains no more than the client requires (2 marks) Total 40 Please note that the Subject Coordinator can award marks within a criterion that fall between the assessment points described. Requirements Adherence to the word count is required.
