Intersections of Violence Against Women and Violence Against Children

 

Bridging the Gaps: Intersections of Violence Against Women and Violence Against Children
In the article “Bridging the gaps: a global review of intersections of violence against women and violence against children,” Guedes, Bott, Garcia-Moreno, and Colombini shed light on the interconnectedness of violence against women (VAW) and violence against children (VAC). They argue that despite historically following separate trajectories, it is crucial to recognize the intersections between these forms of violence as they are global human rights and public health issues. By examining the intersections, the authors advocate for integrated approaches to addressing and preventing both VAW and VAC.

One key concept that the authors explore is the recognition of VAW and VAC as global human rights and public health problems. They emphasize the international community’s acknowledgment of the severity and impact of these forms of violence on individuals and societies. By framing VAW and VAC as human rights issues, the authors highlight the need for a comprehensive and rights-based approach to address and prevent these forms of violence.

To understand the intersections between VAW and VAC, the authors conduct a global review of research, programs, and policies. They reveal that historically, these issues have been treated as separate entities, with distinct trajectories of research and interventions. However, the authors argue that this separation overlooks the underlying connections and shared risk factors between VAW and VAC. By examining the intersections, they advocate for a more integrated and holistic approach to addressing both forms of violence.

In connecting the authors’ work to other texts and concepts assigned for the week, two significant connections emerge. Firstly, their analysis aligns with the concept of a continuum of violence, as discussed by Krug et al. (2002). The authors argue that violence against women and violence against children exist on a continuum and share common risk factors. For example, witnessing violence in the home can be both a form of VAW and VAC, highlighting the interconnectedness of these issues. This connection underscores the necessity of addressing violence holistically and recognizing the interplay between different forms of violence.

Secondly, the authors’ exploration of integrated approaches resonates with the concept of intersectionality, as explored by Crenshaw (1989). By recognizing the intersections between VAW and VAC, the authors acknowledge that individuals can experience multiple forms of violence simultaneously. For instance, a child may witness their mother being subjected to intimate partner violence, thus experiencing both VAW and VAC. This connection highlights the importance of understanding the unique experiences and vulnerabilities of individuals who are affected by multiple forms of violence.

Overall, Guedes, Bott, Garcia-Moreno, and Colombini’s article emphasizes the interconnectedness of VAW and VAC. By examining the intersections and shared risk factors, the authors advocate for integrated approaches to addressing and preventing both forms of violence. Connecting their work to concepts such as the continuum of violence and intersectionality, the authors provide a comprehensive analysis that underscores the need for a holistic and rights-based approach. As we strive for a society free from violence, it is crucial to recognize and address the intersections between VAW and VAC to create meaningful and lasting change.