[Your Name]
[Your Position]
[Your Company]
[Date]
To: [Fund Administrator’s Name]
From: [Your Name]
Subject: Financial Analysis of Boeing Corporation and Airbus: Investment Recommendation
Introduction
As we approach a presidential election year, the potential for shifts in defense spending necessitates a thorough analysis of our investment in Boeing Corporation, especially given its significant operations in defense contracting. This memo provides an overview of the liquidity, profitability, and solvency ratios that are critical for assessing the financial health of Boeing and its competitor, Airbus. Based on these evaluations, I will present a recommendation regarding our investment strategy.
Financial Ratios Overview
1. Liquidity Ratios: These ratios measure a company’s ability to meet its short-term obligations. Key liquidity ratios include:
– Current Ratio: Current Assets / Current Liabilities
– Quick Ratio: (Current Assets – Inventories) / Current Liabilities
2. Profitability Ratios: These ratios assess a company’s ability to generate earnings relative to its revenue, assets, or equity. Important profitability ratios include:
– Net Profit Margin: Net Income / Revenue
– Return on Assets (ROA): Net Income / Total Assets
– Return on Equity (ROE): Net Income / Shareholders’ Equity
3. Solvency Ratios: These ratios evaluate a company’s long-term financial stability and ability to meet long-term obligations. Key solvency ratios include:
– Debt to Equity Ratio: Total Liabilities / Shareholders’ Equity
– Interest Coverage Ratio: Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT) / Interest Expense
Financial Ratios Calculation
Boeing Corporation (2018)
Based on Boeing’s 2018 financial statements:
– Current Assets: $95.0 billion
– Current Liabilities: $76.0 billion
– Net Income: $10.5 billion
– Total Assets: $106.0 billion
– Shareholders’ Equity: $16.8 billion
– Total Liabilities: $89.2 billion
– EBIT: $12.3 billion
– Interest Expense: $1.1 billion
Calculations:
– Current Ratio = 95.0 / 76.0 = 1.25
– Quick Ratio = (95.0 – 20.0) / 76.0 = 0.99 (assuming inventories of $20 billion)
– Net Profit Margin = 10.5 / 101.1 = 10.39% (assuming revenue of $101.1 billion)
– Return on Assets (ROA) = 10.5 / 106.0 = 9.91%
– Return on Equity (ROE) = 10.5 / 16.8 = 62.5%
– Debt to Equity Ratio = 89.2 / 16.8 = 5.30
– Interest Coverage Ratio = 12.3 / 1.1 = 11.18
Airbus (2018)
Based on Airbus’s 2018 financial statements:
– Current Assets: €52 billion (~$60 billion)
– Current Liabilities: €42 billion (~$48 billion)
– Net Income: €3 billion (~$3.5 billion)
– Total Assets: €103 billion (~$120 billion)
– Shareholders’ Equity: €30 billion (~$35 billion)
– Total Liabilities: €73 billion (~$85 billion)
– EBIT: €5 billion (~$5.8 billion)
– Interest Expense: €0.5 billion (~$0.58 billion)
Calculations:
– Current Ratio = 60 / 48 = 1.25
– Quick Ratio = (60 – 10) / 48 = 1.04 (assuming inventories of $10 billion)
– Net Profit Margin = 3.5 / 74 = 4.73% (assuming revenue of $74 billion)
– Return on Assets (ROA) = 3.5 / 120 = 2.92%
– Return on Equity (ROE) = 3.5 / 35 = 10%
– Debt to Equity Ratio = 85 / 35 = 2.43
– Interest Coverage Ratio = 5.8 / 0.58 = 10
Comparison of Financial Ratios
Ratio Boeing Airbus
Current Ratio 1.25 1.25
Quick Ratio 0.99 1.04
Net Profit Margin 10.39% 4.73%
Return on Assets 9.91% 2.92%
Return on Equity 62.5% 10%
Debt to Equity Ratio 5.30 2.43
Interest Coverage Ratio 11.18 10
Analysis and Recommendation
Based on the calculated ratios, Boeing demonstrates superior profitability performance with a higher net profit margin (10.39% vs. Airbus’s 4.73%), return on assets (9.91% vs. Airbus’s 2.92%), and return on equity (62.5% vs. Airbus’s 10%). However, Boeing also exhibits a significantly higher debt-to-equity ratio (5.30), indicating greater leverage compared to Airbus’s more conservative ratio of 2.43.
While both companies maintain acceptable liquidity ratios, Boeing’s quick ratio suggests it may face challenges in covering its short-term liabilities if needed, especially given the substantial defense investments at stake.
In light of the potential for reduced defense funding, there is inherent risk associated with continuing investment in Boeing; however, its strong profitability metrics showcase a capacity for resilience under adverse conditions.
Based on this analysis, it is recommended to maintain our investment in Boeing but closely monitor developments regarding defense spending and overall market conditions that may affect Boeing’s operations and profitability in the near future.
Conclusion
The financial assessment shows that while both Boeing and Airbus have strengths, Boeing’s superior profitability metrics indicate stronger operational performance despite higher leverage risks. Given the political climate surrounding defense funding, strategic monitoring is essential while continuing support for Boeing as an investment.
[Note: The numbers used in this memo are illustrative and may not reflect actual financial data from Boeing or Airbus.]
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
