Examining Social Inequalities in Trading Places and Saint of Fort Washington

 

Title: Examining Social Inequalities in Trading Places and Saint of Fort Washington

Introduction:
The movies Trading Places and Saint of Fort Washington offer thought-provoking narratives that shed light on various social inequalities prevalent in society. This essay will explore multiple examples of racial inequality, poverty and wealth inequality, as well as gender inequality depicted in both films. Additionally, it will analyze the perspectives of conflict theorists, highlighting specific details and aspects within each movie that align with their viewpoint.

Examples of Social Inequalities:

a) Racial Inequality:

In Trading Places, racial inequality is evident when Louis Winthorpe III (a white man) and Billy Ray Valentine (a black man) are manipulated by the wealthy Duke brothers. The Dukes exploit the racial stereotypes surrounding the characters, positioning Valentine as a criminal and Winthorpe as a successful businessman.
Similarly, in Saint of Fort Washington, racial inequality is showcased through the experiences of Jerry/Nathaniel (a homeless black man) and Matthew (a white man) living on the streets of New York City. They face discrimination, unequal access to resources, and are subjected to police harassment due to their race.

b) Poverty and Wealth Inequality:

Trading Places addresses wealth inequality by highlighting the stark contrast between the opulent lifestyle of the Dukes and the destitution endured by Valentine. This juxtaposition emphasizes how social class can dictate opportunities and privileges.
In Saint of Fort Washington, poverty is depicted through the struggles faced by Jerry/Nathaniel and Matthew, who lack access to stable housing, healthcare, and employment opportunities. The film showcases the vast disparities in wealth distribution within urban settings.

c) Gender Inequality:

Although gender inequality is not a central focus of these films, Trading Places portrays gender bias in the workplace. The character of Ophelia, a capable employee at Duke & Duke, faces sexism from her colleagues, who question her competence based on her gender.
In Saint of Fort Washington, gender inequality is subtly shown through the experiences of Joyce, a woman working at a homeless shelter. She faces challenges and dismissive attitudes from her male colleagues, highlighting systemic gender biases that exist within society.

Conflict Theory Perspective:
Conflict theorists would analyze these films through the lens of social hierarchies and power struggles. They would emphasize the following aspects to support their viewpoint:

Power Imbalances: Both movies highlight how those in positions of power exploit marginalized individuals for personal gain. The wealthy characters in Trading Places and the shelter management in Saint of Fort Washington use their influence to maintain control over others.
Structural Inequalities: Conflict theorists would argue that racial, wealth, and gender inequalities are not accidental but rather embedded within social structures. They would emphasize how these inequalities perpetuate a system that benefits the privileged while marginalizing certain groups.
Exploitation and Resistance: Conflict theorists would point out instances of resistance against oppressive systems within each film. Valentine’s character in Trading Places challenges the stereotypes imposed on him, while Jerry/Nathaniel in Saint of Fort Washington fights against the dehumanizing conditions faced by the homeless.

Conclusion:
Trading Places and Saint of Fort Washington effectively shed light on various dimensions of social inequalities such as racial, poverty and wealth, and gender disparities. By examining these films through a conflict theory perspective, we gain a deeper understanding of how power dynamics, structural inequalities, and resistance play significant roles in perpetuating or challenging social injustices.