Ethical perspective

 

Ethical Perspectives in a Community Action Group
Part 1
Ethical Perspective: Deontology (Ethics of Duty)

Needs of the group: A sense of fairness and adherence to rules and responsibilities.
Perceiving and addressing the controlling group member: Someone with this ethical perspective would assert the importance of equal participation and shared decision-making, emphasizing respect for each member’s autonomy and input.
Perceiving and addressing the member dealing with personal challenges: They would recognize the need for empathy and support, understanding that personal circumstances can affect participation. They would encourage the individual to communicate their challenges and explore ways to accommodate their needs.
Perceiving and addressing the male group member interrupting the female team member: They would consider it a breach of respect and fairness. They would intervene, reminding everyone of the importance of active listening, allowing each person to express their ideas fully, and discouraging any form of discrimination or bias.
Ethical Perspective: Rights Ethics

Needs of the group: Protection of individual rights and fair treatment.
Perceiving and addressing the controlling group member: They would emphasize that every member has the right to express their ideas and perspectives. They would encourage open dialogue while ensuring that no one dominates the conversation or disregards others’ input.
Perceiving and addressing the member dealing with personal challenges: They would recognize the individual’s right to participate as much as they are able, without feeling pressured or excluded. They would offer support, flexibility, and accommodations based on the person’s needs.
Perceiving and addressing the male group member interrupting the female team member: They would acknowledge that everyone has the right to be heard and respected. They would address the interruption directly, reminding the male member of the importance of active listening, equal participation, and respectful communication.
Ethical Perspective: Ethical Egoism

Needs of the group: Fulfillment of individual self-interests.
Perceiving and addressing the controlling group member: They would focus on promoting the benefits of collaboration and shared decision-making, highlighting how everyone’s perspectives contribute to better outcomes. They would appeal to the controlling member’s self-interest by demonstrating how their ideas can be enhanced through collective input.
Perceiving and addressing the member dealing with personal challenges: They would consider how accommodating the needs of this member can contribute to a positive group dynamic. By supporting and assisting them during difficult times, they can foster a sense of loyalty and future reciprocity within the group.
Perceiving and addressing the male group member interrupting the female team member: They would recognize that promoting respectful communication benefits everyone in the long run. They would highlight how interrupting others can hinder collaborative problem-solving, potentially impeding the male member’s own goals.
Ethical Perspective: Utilitarianism

Needs of the group: Maximizing overall happiness and well-being.
Perceiving and addressing the controlling group member: They would emphasize that a collaborative approach leads to better outcomes for all members, increasing overall group satisfaction. By promoting fairness and equal participation, they aim to create a positive and inclusive environment.
Perceiving and addressing the member dealing with personal challenges: They would consider how supporting this member can contribute to overall group happiness. By offering understanding, flexibility, and accommodations, they aim to create an environment where everyone feels valued, leading to increased satisfaction for all.
Perceiving and addressing the male group member interrupting the female team member: They would recognize that fostering a respectful and inclusive environment benefits everyone’s happiness. By highlighting how active listening and equal participation contribute to better solutions, they aim to create an atmosphere where all members feel valued and satisfied.
Part 2
Ethical perspectives play a crucial role in real-world scenarios, particularly in the workplace.

In many workplaces, ethical perspectives influence decision-making processes, team dynamics, and organizational culture. Each perspective brings different considerations to the table, ensuring a balance between individual needs and those of the larger group.

An example of these ethical perspectives in action is in a workplace project where multiple teams collaborate towards a common goal. In this situation, individuals with a deontological perspective would emphasize adherence to rules, responsibilities, and fair procedures. They would ensure that each team has equal representation and opportunities for input, avoiding domination by any particular team or individual.

Those with a rights ethics perspective would focus on protecting individuals’ rights within each team. They would ensure that every team member has equal opportunities for participation and decision-making. If a team member is struggling personally, they would advocate for accommodations that respect their rights while still enabling them to contribute in meaningful ways.

Ethical egoism would come into play when individuals consider their own self-interests within their respective teams. They may assert their ideas or perspectives while recognizing that collaboration with other teams leads to better overall outcomes. This perspective encourages individuals to find ways to align their interests with those of other teams for mutual benefit.

Utilitarianism emphasizes maximizing overall happiness and well-being for all teams involved. Decision-making processes would focus on achieving outcomes that create the most positive impact on everyone’s satisfaction. This perspective encourages collaboration, equal participation, and empathy towards individuals facing personal challenges.

The benefits of these ethical perspectives lie in their ability to bring diverse considerations to decision-making processes. By balancing individual needs with those of the larger group, ethical perspectives promote fairness, inclusivity, and overall satisfaction. However, there can be downfalls if these perspectives are taken to extremes. For example, an overemphasis on individual rights may neglect collective goals, while an excessive focus on maximizing happiness may overlook certain individuals’ needs.

In conclusion, ethical perspectives are vital in real-world scenarios, including workplaces. Understanding these perspectives allows individuals to approach situations with different considerations in mind, effectively balancing individual needs with those of the larger group. By fostering fairness, inclusivity, and overall satisfaction, ethical perspectives contribute to positive team dynamics and successful outcomes.