USMC Major Sherwood Moran’s 1943 letter of advice to those engaged in WW II interrogations of Japanese prisoners

Part 1: Compare, contrast, and discuss USMC Major Sherwood Moran’s 1943 letter of advice to those engaged
in WW II interrogations of Japanese prisoners to the insights offered by former U.S. Air Force Colonel Stephen
Kleinman’s 2007 in his interview at George Washington University when talking about interrogations in relation
to the War on Terrorism.
Part 2: Using the relevant U.S. Supreme Court case law of Brown v. Mississippi in 1936; Chambers v. Florida in
1940; Rochin v. California in 1952; and Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 discuss their influence on law enforcement
investigative and custodial interrogation practices within the U.S

“The Secret Cause of Flame Wars”

Our choices of social media shape our perceptions of events, issues, and people. Cultural memberships influence the content of digital and online communication. Social media have altered how we perceive time and space. People tend to feel anonymous online, even when they have a name associated with their avatar. On the internet, computer mediated conversations lack body language, voice intonation, and other important nonverbal elements. Without these features, people are compelled to fill in the gaps with assumptions about the nonverbal elements.

For some reason, people become much more sensitive when they’re online, and they tend to blow things entirely out of proportion—for example, taking a couple of sentences originally meant to be humorous or sarcastic entirely the wrong way. It’s even worse if you’ve had a bad day and you’ve decided that “no one likes you” (we’ve all had those moments); you’re much more susceptible to misunderstanding messages. Once that happens, everything can go downhill quickly. Instead of asking for clarification (“You were kidding, weren’t you?”) or just ignoring it, many people—forgetting that they’re dealing with another human being on the other end—decide to defend themselves and tell the originator of the offending message exactly what they think of him or her. This outcome is what’s known in the business as a flame. If both sides begin insulting each other, it’s called a flame war (kind of like fighting fire with fire). These digital battles often erupt in “public” and can sometimes be very entertaining to the lurkers.”

Read the article “The Secret Cause of Flame Wars” to get started on this topic.

· Create a 5 – 10 slide PowerPoint Presentation with audio. Add your own audio recordings to each slide.

· Include a title slide (with your name and introduce the topic you’ll be sharing in the presentation).

· Then include slides and describe a situation online where you witnessed trolling and flaming. What was the situation? How were the comments handled?

· Do you think this same situation would have happened in a face-to-face environment? Why or why not?

· How can situations like this be minimized? Please use the terms for your text about social media and nonverbal and guidelines for improving nonverbal communication found in Chapter 5 to respond to this question.

US Invasion Of Iraq

Write 700 words at least to answer this question.

Why did the United States Invade and Occupy Iraq in 2003? Why did the US go to War in Iraq? Was it because of Weapons of Mass destruction, the War on Terror, oil, recasting the military, world hegemony, reform of the Greater Middle East, spreading democracy, or because a small group of policy makers (the Neo-conservatives) had inordinate influence?

The evolution of the unions goals in the civil war.

You are to write a five page typed, or seven pages hand written, analysis in which you in operate lectures and the appropriate texts, articles and other readings to answer the broad conceptual question. This is not a book report so you understand the work’s thesis and subject matter, and how that source relates your other sources, and to your chosen topic. You may use sources that agree with, or contradict one another. If you use sources that agree, then your piece will be a compare work. If your sources contradict each other, then your piece will be a contradict piece. The data points that you will choose must fall between the years 1800-1865.