Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 12
Lesson 1, 2
The Doctors’ Choice is America’s Choice”: The Physician in US Cigarette Advertisements, 1930-1953 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470496/
The Opioid Epidemic: It’s Time to Place Blame Where It Belongs https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140023/
Introduction
The medical profession has a muddled and contradictory association with its approach toward the tobacco industry. While the profession now firmly opposes to smoking and vigorously publicizes the serious, even fatal, health hazards associated with smoking, this was not always so. Advertisements for tobacco products, including cigarettes “… became a ready source of income for numerous medical organizations and journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), as well as many branches and bulletins of local medical associations” (Wolinsky & Brune, 1994). Physicians and reference to doctors and smoking were once common in tobacco industry advertisements. The story of physicians and promotion of smoking can be found in “The Doctors’ Choice Is America’s Choice” (Gardner & Brandt, 2006).
The role of physicians in the current opioid crisis is now under scrutiny on television (Farmer, 2019) by trade publications (King, 2018), peer-reviewed journals (deShazo, et al, 2018), and by physicians themselves (Hirsch, 2019).
Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, research the history of the association of doctors with tobacco companies and tobacco advertising. Read about the association of doctors with the opioid crisis. Then, address the following:
In what way are the two situations comparable?
In what way are they different?
Apply the concept of moral equivalence. Is the conduct of doctors in relation to smoking and the tobacco industry morally equivalent to the conduct of doctors in the opioid crisis? Explain your position and be very specific.
Category: philosophy
The methodology of both studies
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Textbook: Chapter 14
Lesson 1, 2
Myopia and Ambient Lighting at Night https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=10335839&site=eds-live&scope=site
Myopia and Ambient Night-Time Lighting https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mdc&AN=10724157&site=eds-live&scope=site
What Are Clinical Trials and Studies? https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/what-are-clinical-trials-and-studies
Introduction
As the text points out, causal reasoning is used in clinical studies. As a professional in the health field, you will undoubtedly be referring to cause/effect studies for the rest of your professional life. In this discussion, you are asked to expand and deepen your understanding of clinical studies.
In 1999, a study on the causes of myopia appeared in the prestigious journal Nature (Quinn). The study received wide-spread publicity in leading newspapers, such as the New York Times, and on television outlets, such as CBS and CNN. Within a year, another article in Nature followed up the 1999 study (Zadnik et al., 2000). The studies had dramatically different findings.
Initial Post Instructions
Using what you have learned from the text, as well as any other sources you may find useful (including the website in the Required Resources), analyze and evaluate the methodology of both studies and how methodology affected the differences in how the studies were reported.
Callicles’ attack against Socrates
Examine Callicles’ attack against Socrates and the philosophical life in Plato’s Gorgias. What is Socrates’ defense against this argument, and why does he continue to engage in philosophy even at great risk to himself?
The unexamined life is not worth living
Socrates said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” The real value of an education, then, is to enhance our skill at self-examination. Do you agree with Socrates? Support your view with at least two examples, explaining your rationale
The implicit bias test
What was your experience of completing the implicit bias test? Which test did you choose, and why?
What self-awareness themes have emerged so far in Week 1’s Discussion and this week’s activities?
Identify a population that you are not comfortable with or would like to know more about; this could be a population represented by the implicit bias test you took, but it does not have to be.
Why might you feel discomfort or want to know more about this population? Consider your origins of thought, socialization into your culture and family, and any biases you may have.
If you integrate the Learning Resources, make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
The implicit bias test
What was your experience of completing the implicit bias test? Which test did you choose, and why?
What self-awareness themes have emerged so far in Week 1’s Discussion and this week’s activities?
Identify a population that you are not comfortable with or would like to know more about; this could be a population represented by the implicit bias test you took, but it does not have to be.
Why might you feel discomfort or want to know more about this population? Consider your origins of thought, socialization into your culture and family, and any biases you may have.
If you integrate the Learning Resources, make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
The implicit bias test
What was your experience of completing the implicit bias test? Which test did you choose, and why?
What self-awareness themes have emerged so far in Week 1’s Discussion and this week’s activities?
Identify a population that you are not comfortable with or would like to know more about; this could be a population represented by the implicit bias test you took, but it does not have to be.
Why might you feel discomfort or want to know more about this population? Consider your origins of thought, socialization into your culture and family, and any biases you may have.
If you integrate the Learning Resources, make sure to provide APA citations and a reference list.
Aristotle Forum Summary
You are going to summarize Aristotle’s thought. Your initial summary should consist of approximately 150 words.
Summarize the following passage below, paying particular attention to Aristotle’s reasoning:
Presumably, however, to say that happiness is the chief good seems a platitude and a clearer account of what is still desired. This might perhaps be given if we could first ascertain the function of man. For just as for a flute-player, a sculptor, or an artist, and, in general, for all things that have a function or activity, the good and the ‘well’ is thought to reside in the function, so would it seem to be for man, if he has a function. Have the carpenter, then, and the tanner certain functions or activities, and has man none? Is he born without a function? Or as eye, hand, foot, and in general each of the parts evidently has a function, may one lay it down that man similarly has a function apart from all these? What then can this be? Life seems to be common even to plants, but we are seeking what is peculiar to man. Let us exclude, therefore, the life of nutrition and growth. Next, there would be a life of perception, but it also seems to be common even to the horse, the ox, and every animal. There remains, then, active life of the element that has a rational principle; of this, one part has such a principle in the sense of being obedient to one, the other in the sense of possessing one and exercising thought. And, as ‘life of the rational element’ also has two meanings, we must state that life in the sense of activity is what we mean; for this seems to be the more proper sense of the term. Now if the function of man is an activity of soul which follows or implies a rational principle, and if we say ‘so-and-so-and ‘a good so-and-so’ have a function which is the same in kind, e.g. a lyre, and a good lyre-player, and so without qualification in all cases, eminence in respect of goodness being added to the name of the function (for the function of a lyre-player is to play the lyre, and that of a good lyre-player is to do so well): if this is the case, and we state the function of man to be a certain kind of life, and this to be an activity or actions of the soul implying a rational principle, and the function of a good man to be the good and noble performance of these, and if any action is well performed when it is performed in accordance with the appropriate excellence: if this is the case, human good turns out to be an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue, and if there are more than one virtue, in accordance with the best and most complete. ( NE Bk. 1, Ch 7)
The life of contemplation
In Book 10 of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues that the best (happiest) life for human beings is the life of contemplation. State Aristotle’s argument for this claim, and assess its consequences for the relative value of the political life (that is, the life of moral virtue). In particular, does Aristotle’s elevation of the contemplative life problematically undermine the value of the political life? Defend your answer.
Happiness is rational activity
State and evaluate Aristotle’s Function Argument in Nicomachean Ethics 1.7 for the claim that happiness is rational activity of the soul in accordance with virtue.