Medication Intolerances

Name: Eileen Turner Pt. Encounter Number: 3

CC:
“Left breast lump”

○ HPI: 47 y/o female G0P0 presents to the office with 5 week history of a lump in the left breast. Pt reports she initially detected the lump during her monthly SBE. She waited until her next cycle to examine again, and the lump persisted. The lump is located in the upper outer corner of the breast. She states that nothing makes it better or worse, and she has not had any treatment up until this point. Denies pain, nipple discharge or recent trauma. No other associated symptoms. Last mammogram 18 months ago was normal. She has been prescribed COC for 15 years for irregular periods. Family history of breast cancer- pts mother deceased age 49 as a result. She is seeking additional testing and work up.

Medications: Levonorgestrel/Ethinyl Estadiol 0.15 mg/0.30mg orally daily for metrorrhagia, HCTZ 25mg daily in AM for HTN

Allergies: NKA

Medication Intolerances: none reported
Past Medical History:
HTN, controlled on HCTZ x 1 year
Metrorrhagia controlled on COC

Hospitalizations/Surgeries
Tonsillectomy as a child

Preventative Health:
Immunizations up to date
Screening mammogram 2 years ago BI-RADS Category 2-benign findings, calcifications noted bilaterally. Compliant with meds but does not regularly monitor her blood pressure.

Family History

Mother: deceased age 49 breast cancer
Father: HTN
No siblings

Social History
She completed her PhD and is currently employed as an elementary school principal. She lives alone, is not currently in a relationship and has no children. Pt reports she feels safe in her home in a gated community with neighbors whom she is friendly with. Denies tobacco, alcohol or recreational drug use.

ROS Student to ask each of these questions to the patient: “Have you had any…..”
General
Overweight but denies weight change or fatigue.
Cardiovascular
Denies.

Skin
Denies.
Respiratory
Denies.

Eyes
Wears glasses but otherwise denies. Gastrointestinal
Denies.

Ears
Denies. Genitourinary/Gynecological
Denies urinary issues.
Last PAP 2020, normal.
G0, P0
Not sexually active.
Takes oral contraception as above.
Nose/Mouth/Throat
Denies.
Musculoskeletal
Denies.
Breast
Performs monthly SBE. Lump outer corner of left breast as described above. Denies nipple discharge or pain. Neurological
Denies.
Heme/Lymph/Endo
Denies. Psychiatric
Denies. Reports feeling anxious regarding presenting problem.
OBJECTIVE
Weight 5’8” BMI 26.9 Temp 98.3 BP 128/74
Height 177lbs Pulse 78, regular Resp 14
General Appearance
Healthy-appearing adult female in no acute distress.
Skin
Skin is brown, warm, dry, clean, and intact. No rashes or lesions noted.
HEENT
No palpable lymph nodes. Thyroid not palpable. Trachea midline.
Cardiovascular
S1, S2 with regular rate and rhythm. No murmurs, gallops or rubs.Pulses 3+ throughout. No edema.
Respiratory
Symmetric chest wall. Respirations regular and easy; lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally.
Gastrointestinal
BS active in all the four quadrants. Abdomen soft, nontender. No hepatosplenomegaly.
Breast
Left breast lump 2cm in diameter, +skin retraction 3 O’clock position, 1cm from nipple. No nipple discharge noted. No tenderness.
Genitourinary
Speculum exam performed, cervix without lesions.
No visible discharge or blood noted in vaginal vault.
Uterus anteverted, mobile and nontender. Adnexa nontender and palpable bilaterally.
Digital rectal exam with no mass, good sphincter tone.
Musculoskeletal
Full ROM seen in all four extremities as the patient moved about the exam room. No joint pain or tenderness on palpation.
Neurological
Alert and oriented x 4. Speech clear. Good tone. Sensation intact.
Psychiatric
Alert and oriented with appropriate mood. Judgement intact. Answers questions appropriately.
Lab Tests/Imaging
Aerobic culture of the breast-negative
Bilateral diagnostic mammogram-BIRADS Category 5-High, suspicion of malignancy
Left breast biopsy under ultrasound guidance-Left Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Assessment
o Include at least three differential diagnoses
o **Breast Abscess
o **Fibroadenoma
o **Fibrocystic breast disease
o *Left breast lump, neoplastic ▪ Provide rationale for each differential diagnosis o Final diagnosis—*Left breast ductal carcinoma in situ
▪ Pathophysiology of primary and rationale for choosing as final
Plan
o **discontinue oral combined hormonal contraceptive pill (CHC)
o **follow up in 3 months
o **refer to breast surgery
o **refer to genetic counselor
o **refer to oncology/radiation oncology
o Medications
o Non-pharmacological recommendations
o Diagnostic tests
o Patient education
o Culture considerations
o Health promotion
o Referrals
o Follow up

The model rules of professional conduct for attorneys, 16-106 NMRA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The general rule is that a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client, however, there are exceptions to this general rule, what type of confidential information can be disclosed under the model rules of professional conduct for attorneys, 16-106 NMRA

The case Canterbury v. Spence

 

review Case law as a foundation for understanding various concepts necessary to understand the law in regard to health care administration. The Canterbury v. Spence case in the background materials dates to 1972, but is considered a “landmark” case in that it established the important concept of the “reasonable person” in regard to informed consent. As clearly explained, the lack of informed consent creates an environment where care providers can be held liable for negligence or torts against a patient.
After reviewing the background readings and doing independent research, examine the case Canterbury v. Spence and answer the following:
1. Provide the background information regarding the case and the decision of the court.
2. Explain informed consent and its required elements.
3. What is the reasonable person standard?
4. Why is informed consent important in medical care?
5. What is the relationship between informed consent and ethics? Include a discussion of relevant ethical principles.
6. What is a hospital’s responsibility in insuring informed consent?

 

Difference between negligence and battery

Litigation against health care providers can happen due to a myriad of factors. This assignment examines malpractice and intentional torts. Review the following article and background materials.
Sohn, D. (2013). Negligence, genuine error, and litigation. International Journal of General Medicine, 6,49-56. Retrieved from the Trident University Library.
You are a new practice manager in a small medical practice made up of individual providers. For a monthly “lunch and learn” session, you have been asked to prepare a presentation examining the more common forms of litigation against practitioners. Prepare a PowerPoint presentation addressing the following questions. You must include thorough speaker’s notes.
CASE ASSIGNMENT
1. Explain the difference between negligence (malpractice) and battery (an intentional tort).
2. Identify and explain the four elements of proof required in a negligence tort case.
3. What is vicarious liability and how is it different from individual liability?
4. Explain malpractice or “tort” reform. Why is it of importance and what are some of the remedies that are considered in tort reform?
5. What are the ethical responsibilities of a medical practice in relation to negligence and battery? Be sure and include a discussion of ethical principles.

 

 

Weight stigma, the issues with BMI or eating disorders

 

Throughout this module you have been exposed to a different way of looking at weight and bodies, than what you may have been exposed to in the past. For
this post choose one of the podcasts listed as well as one of the readings to talk about the topic of weight stigma, the issues with BMI or eating disorders.
Post should be 400-500 words and referenced in APA format

 

 

The reasoning for judicial

Paper details:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/read-justice-alito-initial-abortion-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade-pdf-00029504
READ THE LINK
Look for gaps in authors’ reasoning.
Think about the broader issues that the author’s arguments point to.
Look for connections between theoretical pieces assigned and concrete actions that can be taken to put them in practice.
Consider connections to current event issues.
do you think the reasoning for judicial review is proper in this case?

 

 

 

Quantum Mechanics

Outline the major features of quantum mechanics and how they are applied to various fields.
In a two-page paper, research three examples of technologies that use quantum mechanics. Explain, in your own words, how these applications impact society. If you or someone you know has ever had an MRI scan for a medical diagnosis, you have experienced the result of quantum physics for measuring bodily structures. Finally, provide another specific example from your own life that could be influenced by these applications.

Patient: Julia Jackson

Julia Jackson is an 84-year-old woman who presents to the Emergency room with severe abdominal pain, especially in the left lower quadrant. An abdominal CT was ordered, and it found that there is a 5cm mass in the lower sigmoid colon with fecal impaction. The patient was admitted to the Med/Surg floor for treatment and resolution of fecal impaction. An oncology consult order was entered. The patient stated she has abdominal pain of 8 out of 10.

Create a presentation that lasts 3- 5 minutes.  
Briefly describe the patient you have been assigned 
Describe the patients’ problem 
As the RN how could teamwork and collaboration benefit this patient and help them reach a positive outcome? 
Identify 2 other healthcare professionals that would be appropriate to collaborate with and why. 
What would be the two outcomes for this patient related to the reason for collaboration with the identified 2 healthcare professionals?

Sports Law: Transfer Portal in College Athletics

 

Examine solutions/best practices that have been offered by others and explain the advantages and disadvantages of those solutions
Discuss the legal implications of the problem and proposed solutions.
Propose your own solution to the problem, including what should be done, by whom, and how it can practically be accomplished

 

 

 

 

The Case Study See v. Seattle.

Complete a descriiptive research report, in APA format, detailing the following items related to the Case Study See v. Seattle:
Discuss the content of the Case Study See v. Seattle.
Discuss how many fire departments gain access to commercial occupancies for the purpose of completing fire inspections.
Discuss the role of the Plain View Doctrine.
Describe the actions required of fire departments to complete fire inspections if consent to access the property is withheld.
Describe how the organization you represents documents consent to access a property and conduct fire inspections.
Proved a substantive conclusions and/or recommendations section.