Self-Leadership

Self-Leadership is defined by the process of influencing oneself. A comprehensive process involving cognitive (thoughts) and behavioral (actions) factors. This definition is derived primarily from research and theory in two (2) areas of psychology: Social Cognitive Theory and Intrinsic Motivation Theory (Self-Determination Theory).

In the first half of the paper compare and contrast Social Cognitive Theory and Intrinsic Motivation Theory. For the second half discuss self-efficacy, a construct from Social Cognitive Theory and Intrinsic Motivation Theory. What are your personal sources of self-efficacy? Think about J.K. Rowling’s and her journey while reviewing your own.

Self Awareness

Your direct reports will soon be going through Emotional Intelligence training and all employees will then be asked to complete their annual review in a new format, as a personal development plan. You have been asked to complete this plan in the new format first before submitting it to your direct report manager. In completing your personal development plan you will focus on the areas of Emotional Intelligence for professional and personal development.

Instructions
Step 1: Take the Self-Assessment. (See attached)
Step 2: Create a reflection document based on the self-assessment findings.
What are your areas of strength? What are your areas of weakness?
What areas did you find most surprising, and why?
What areas did you find least surprising, and why?
What areas can you identify for professional growth and development? Support your answer with your findings.

The three leadership positions

 

 

 

 

 

Discuss the three leadership positions (supervisors, managers, and administrators) in criminal justice agencies. Include specific examples of each leadership position’s roles and responsibilities in your answer. If you had to choose, which position would you like to ultimately hold? Explain your rationale.

 

Toxic Leadership

 

Describe a situation from your personal work experience in which you encountered a toxic leader. Describe the traits that qualify this leader as “toxic” and indicate how the situation could be different if this individual applied the concepts of conscious leadership.

The angry mother

The angry mother…
Devon returned home from his 5th grade class with his report card. His mother, Brenda Washington, became very upset. In her middle-class suburb, she was close to several of her neighbors—parents of Devon’s friends. They frequently compared notes on their children’s progress, and she knew that Devon was doing as well as his friend, James Robinson. However, in his English class, Devon had received a D. His abilities were clearly superior to those of James, but after talking with James’ mother and finding out that James had received a C, Ms. Washington made her way to the school. She raised her voice with the teacher, claiming that she must have given Devon a lower grade because he was Black. The teacher became defensive and claimed that she ran a color-blind classroom. Ms. Washington decided to take the case to the principal. As she strode down the hallway, she saw the White teachers in their room, and the “success” posters on the wall, which all contained White children. She wondered what to expect when she saw the principal.
Case Study questions
· Is intolerance involved? Explain your answer.
· How does the case relate to some of the different dimensions of intolerance described in the book?
· Do you feel that specific intolerances, such as racism or sexism, should be determined by intent or by result? Explain your answer.

How leaders balance timeliness and quality of decisions

Leading in complex organizational environments is a challenging endeavor that can sometimes cause a freezing of action and decision making. In systems thinking, leader decisions can have ramifications well beyond what is evident or obvious. So, while getting to a decision as quickly as practicable is very important for leaders, these decisions must also be of high quality and consider downstream effects. How do leaders balance timeliness and quality of decisions? What are the most significant considerations for leaders when trying to synthesize the available information sufficiently to make a timely, effective decision? Why?