Skip to content
1. In the R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that cross burnings are a form of free speech protected by the First Amendment. What reasons did the Court give for this decision? Do you agree or disagree? Why?
2. What reasons did the Court give for upholding enhanced penalties in the sentence of Todd Mitchell? Do you agree with the reasons? Why or why not?
Give your point of view regarding the “Florida Free Kill Law”, Section 768.21.
Create a deliverable that communicates the information below.
Explain the concept of federalism.
As part of your deliverable, be sure to include information on the various theories of federalism we studied this week.
Identify which theory you believe best describes U.S. federalism.
Evaluate how a classmates view on the choices by the prosecutor and defense attorney might affect the search for justice in the future. For example, if the prosecutors/defense attorneys actions are acceptable to your classmate, what could that mean in cases next year?
Topic: A Comparative Analysis of the CISG and Current UK Sales Law with a Focus on Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)”
Write an essay explaining the points.
1. Arguments For Ratification:Harmonization with international trade partners.Potential benefits for SMEs in reducing legal uncertainty.Enhancing the UK’s competitiveness post-Brexit.
2. Arguments Against Ratification:The potential complexity of dual systems (CISG vs. domestic law).Risks for SMEs unfamiliar with CISG provisions.The adequacy of existing UK sales law for SMEs’ needs.
Identify the Source of Law
For this Discussion, you will research two actions by a corporation to which you can identify the source of law. First. look for an action that is legal but strikes you as unethical. Second, look for an action that is ethical but illegal.
Share Your Thoughts
Go to the Module 2 Discussion Board and share your thoughts about the Act in 150 to 200 words.
Your post should address the following questions/points:
• Explain the act you researched performed by a corporation that is legal but strikes you as wrong or unethical.
o Identify the source of law under which this action fallstor example, if it is administrative. state, or federal statute or case laws.
o Why do you think an action can be legal as well as unethical?
Explain the act you found performed by either a corporation or individual that is ethical but illegal.
o Identify the source of law under which this action falls, for example. if it is administrative, state, or federal statute or case laws.
o Is it more likely to happen individually or as a corporation? Explain why. o Find a legal precedent that supports your premise.
Find case law regarding Heresay, the right to face the accuser, burden of proof or any other pertinent applications here? What occurred prior to these rules of evidence that allowed these to be decided?
Scenario IV: Product Liability
Shenzhen Limited manufactures electric hair dryers. Julie purchases a Shenzhen Limited dryer from her local Sallys Beauty Supply. Frances, a friend and guest in Julies home, has taken a shower and wants to dry her hair. Julie tells Frances to use the new Shenzhen Limited hair dryer that she has just purchased. As Frances plugs in the dryer, sparks fly out from the motor, and sparks continue to fly as she operates it. Despite this, Frances begins drying her hair. Suddenly, the entire dryer ignites into flames, severely burning Frances scalp. Frances sues Shenzhen Limited on the basis of negligence and strict liability in tort. Shenzhen Limited admits that the dryer was defective but denies liability, particularly because Frances was not the person who purchased the dryer. In other words, Frances had no contractual relationship with Shenzhen Limited.
Discuss the validity of Shenzhen Limiteds defense.
Are there any other defenses that Shenzhen Limited might assert to avoid liability? Discuss fully.
What are the three standards used by the courts when deciding to accept expert witness testimony.
What is the proper procedure for the collection, preservation, and storage of digital evidence? Include steps taken at the crime scene. What are the legal challenges?