Research on a charity

 

Identify an organized charity (I have chosen Bread For City, https://breadforthecity.org). Below are questions to kick start research and while your research should address them, they are not limited to these questions. These are intended to get you launched but I want to encourage your own instincts in crafting the essays. While I encourage creativity, you are required to write about the connections between what you have learned about the organization and course readings:
* What is the name of the organization and what (if any) message about the organization is disclosed by its name?
* What kind of organization is it? Where is it and where does it do its work and what kind of place is that?
* What are its goals/mission statement?
* What is the founding history of the organization, including who was the founder and backstory about them (i.e., what led them to create organization and define its focus/work?)
* What does it do as its primary activity (i.e., what is “the work” of the organization?) How do its actions/programs relate to its mission statement? What is your assessment of the connection between mission statement and the work of the organization?
* Does the charity provide materials benefits (like basic needs supports of food, housing, etc.) (and if so, what sorts) and/or moral uplift/counseling (and if so, what sorts)—or possibly some combination of the two?
* Is this a membership organization? Who are the members and what is the basis of membership? Where do they meet, do their work, etc.? When and how did they become organized?
* Is the organization based on patron-client relationships? Who are “the patrons” and “the clients” and how are they recruited/selected?
* How would you characterize the relationship between the charity and their social justice focus? Are they providing emergency assistance (e.g., after a natural disaster)? Seeking long-term structural changes?
* Based on what you can learn about the organization, how does it conceptualize the people they are hoping to help? Victims? Clients? Partners? Co-community members?
* How did you find out about the organization and its work? What kind of media/online presence does it have either directly or through connections with other organizations and/or media outlets?
* How does the organization work in coalition with others? Find specific examples of when and how. Are there turf issues between it and other organizations working in the same area (geographically or topically defined)?
* What can you discern about the internal processes of the organization? Does it seem to operate according to democratic principles; is there one strong leader, perhaps a charismatic founder? Is there a large or small staff?
* How do the readings of the two weeks of the course about charity help you understand the charity organization that is the focus of your essay?
* How does the organization define charity (explicitly or implicitly)?
* Make specific connections with key concepts and arguments in the readings, for example about Wagner’s conception of “repressive benevolence”; Poppendieck’s arguments about charity and dignity and charity’s “moral bargain”; and Peck and Tickell’s notions of roll back and roll out neoliberalism.

 

Governance in a less flattering light

 

 

PROMPT-While Tierney (2012) offers a fairly neutral assessment, Ahrens and Rudolph (2006) Download Ahrens and Rudolph (2006) discuss governance in a less flattering light: they argue that poor institutional arrangements and poor governance lead to ineffective risk reduction and poor disaster management.
How do you assess the Ahrens and Rudolph argument – including how they think bad governance can be overcome?
Would you say they are over-stating or under-stating the challenges for governing disasters and risk reduction?
Does what Tierney (2012) have to say about hazards governance suggest the Ahrens and Rudolph (2006) argument is fairly accurate or inaccurate — and
why?

 

Governance in a less flattering light

 

 

PROMPT-While Tierney (2012) offers a fairly neutral assessment, Ahrens and Rudolph (2006) Download Ahrens and Rudolph (2006) discuss governance in a less flattering light: they argue that poor institutional arrangements and poor governance lead to ineffective risk reduction and poor disaster management.
How do you assess the Ahrens and Rudolph argument – including how they think bad governance can be overcome?
Would you say they are over-stating or under-stating the challenges for governing disasters and risk reduction?
Does what Tierney (2012) have to say about hazards governance suggest the Ahrens and Rudolph (2006) argument is fairly accurate or inaccurate — and
why?

 

Disaster governance in 2012

 

PROMPT-Tierney (2012) Download Tierney (2012) offers a comprehensive assessment of the knowledge base on disaster governance in 2012.
How does Tierney (2012) define governance in the context of hazards and disasters?
How do scale, networks, and capabilities affect disaster governance and governance regimes according to Tierney (2012)?
Would you say that Tierney (2012) is are over-stating or under-stating the challenges for governing disasters and risk reduction?

Disaster governance in 2012

 

PROMPT-Tierney (2012) Download Tierney (2012) offers a comprehensive assessment of the knowledge base on disaster governance in 2012.
How does Tierney (2012) define governance in the context of hazards and disasters?
How do scale, networks, and capabilities affect disaster governance and governance regimes according to Tierney (2012)?
Would you say that Tierney (2012) is are over-stating or under-stating the challenges for governing disasters and risk reduction?

Hazards governance in practical terms

 

 

PROMPT-Gerber (2020) Download Gerber (2020)provides a way of thinking about hazards governance in practical terms of how communities collectively make decisions over the production of public goods, including efforts at risk reduction and resilience capacity promotion.
In your view, what is most helpful about Gerber’s (2020) attempt to define and explain the idea of governance?
According to Gerber (2020) what is critical to understanding how key public goods are produced?

Hazards governance in practical terms

 

 

PROMPT-Gerber (2020) Download Gerber (2020)provides a way of thinking about hazards governance in practical terms of how communities collectively make decisions over the production of public goods, including efforts at risk reduction and resilience capacity promotion.
In your view, what is most helpful about Gerber’s (2020) attempt to define and explain the idea of governance?
According to Gerber (2020) what is critical to understanding how key public goods are produced?

Moral traits in a character

In the novel Sula by Toni Morrison which cultural, physical, or geographical surroundings shape psychological or moral traits in a character. Then write a wellorganized essay in which you analyze how surroundings affect this character and illuminate the meaning of the work as a whole. Do not merely summarizethe plot.

DNP entry essay

 

The applicant should read the two proposed articles. After reading both articles, the applicant will reflect on the role of a DNP-prepared nurse in the
healthcare system and answer the following questions:
1. Why is there a need for DNP-prepared nurses in the current healthcare system?
2. How do you anticipate that a degree in Doctor of Nursing Practice Healthcare Administration will impact your career?
3. Based on the proposed articles, provide a few examples on how you will be able to translate in action the knowledge gained in the DNP in your current workplace or work field?

 

 

 

The perspective of Grendel, the monster in the epic tale Beowulf.

Write a narrative from the perspective of Grendel, the monster in the epic tale Beowulf. Your story must center on a conflict that reveals something important
about the main character. The conflict must be resolved in some way by the end of the story.
Write a narrative from the point of view of Grendel. As you write, you’ll make decisions about structure and development to enhance overall meaning. You
should stick to the facts in the original story — that Beowulf came from across the sea to fight Grendel, that Hrothgar was a king, etc. Other than those facts,
though, you can make up whatever you like about the characters and setting. For example, you can decide that Beowulf really dislikes Hrothgar; he’s just
doing what his culture feels is the right thing to do. Or you can give Grendel a soft side: maybe he can’t help it that he has this insatiable craving for humans?
Be creative!
It has to be written in first person, it sould plot that follows Freytag’s pyramid, including exposition, rising action, a climax, falling action, and a conclusion
You should at least have 4 fully-developed paragraphs or “chapters”:
1st chapter establishes setting and characters (exposition)
2nd chapter introduces and builds up the problem or situation (rising action)
3rd chapter focuses on the conflict and climax
4th/5th chapter(s) resolves the conflict and concludes the story (falling action/conclusion)
Your assignment should include the following elements:
A central conflict that drives the story
Vivid descriiption that makes the scenes believable
Characterization that conveys the main character’s personality and feelings
A plot that follows Freytag’s pyramid, including exposition, rising action, a climax, falling action, and a conclusion