Realism vs. Idealism

Realism vs. Idealism: For this paper, answer the question of whether you believe it is better to be realistic or idealistic when approaching the challenges we
face in 2023? Realists–as embodied by Niccolò Machiavelli–believe we must approach the world as it “really is,” even if that means getting ahead by lying,
cheating, or other bad behavior. Idealists–as embodied by Plato–believe we should reach for lofty ideals even if we can’t attain them.
Is realism or idealism a better approach to climate change? Political unrest? Misinformation online? You can choose any contemporary challenge or
challenges you see fit. For this essay, you must cite both Plato and Machiavelli. You may want to do outside research for this topic, but please make sure to
cite your sources.

 

 

 

importance of not being distracted by worldly thoughts

Hesychasm emphasized the importance of not being distracted by worldly thoughts; positively, it emphasized the importance of the “Jesus Prayer” – “Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner” – as a means of concentrating the mind and unlocking the heart.
Write a 300 word response Hesychasm as a eastern Orthodox, or Byzantine critique of rationalistic Scholasticism. Describe the primary theologians and the basic premises of Hesychasm.
Give a brief review or summary of Byzantine Hesychasm from chapter 2, p. 115.
Give you own reaction to the points raised by Symeon the New Theologian in his critique of Scholasticism. Do you agree with him? Disagree?
What are some examples of how eastern Hesychasm might be compared to western mysticism?
Do you think that the filoque controversy of 1054 over the Holy Spirit’s place in the creeds might symbolize an overly rational approach to the experience of God in the West? Do you think that the eastern church gave greater prominence to the role of the Spirit?

Maximizing Shipments Fulfillment

Write a proposal on Maximizing Shipments Fulfillment through Effective Assignment Optimization
GUIDE FOR PROJECT PROPOSAL MUST FOLLOW.

  1. Introduction
    • Describe the general area to be studied in this project (see Guide-1).
    • Identify a specific topic of study and its context (i.e., company/department).
    • Explain the problem/issue you intend to study and its significance.
  2. Statement of the Problem
    State the problem to be studied in a brief and concise manner. Conclude this with a proposed title for your project.
  3. Background/ Review of the Literature
    Briefly review the existing literature, which bears on the stated problem. Your focus will be to:
    • Summarize what is already known about the topic.
    • Make sure to cite all works mentioned throughout the research proposal.
    • References should be listed in an acceptable format (for example APA style).
  4. Methodology
    This section should describe the procedures and techniques for carrying out the project and should include at least the following points:
    a. The nature of the data/information to be collected,
    b. The methods for collecting the data and its sources.
  5. Analysis Plan
    You may include in the proposal, your plan on how you are going to analyze the problem, and what techniques do you intend to use.
  6. Time Table
    In the proposal, you must specify the number of weeks for each of the suggested steps in the outline. Remember, you should complete and submit the final report before the end of the summer term.

A compare and contrast essay

This is a compare and contrast essay of these 2 article’s use of ethos pathos and logos https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/04/business/economy/economists-take-aim-at-wealth-inequality.html?searchResultPosition=8 and https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/01/opinion/economic-inequality-moral-philosophy.html I already did the rough draft I just need a revised final with 2 more additional pages.

Selecting A Job Evaluation Method

Select and write about a job evaluation method, in 3-4 pages, using the company and job from the previous assessments.
Introduction
Along with the job analysis and job evaluation, companies must determine how they will structure their pay and which model is the most appropriate for their company. Companies also have to consider the competitive position of their pay policy. As an HR professional, it is important to understand the different pay structures, and the process of gathering and interpreting data to determine a competitive pay position. What does it mean to be competitive and pay a salary that is not only internally equitable, but is also externally effective at attracting and retaining the appropriate labor force for your business? This assessment challenges you to consider all the issues that go into that decision making.
Job evaluation is the process of comparing a job against other jobs within the organization to determine the appropriate pay rate. There are four primary methods of job evaluations used to set compensation levels: point factor, factor comparison, job ranking, and job classification. Historically, evaluations have mainly been internal comparisons of job worth; however, in recent years employers often prefer to use a combination of internal comparisons and external market benchmarking to obtain the most accurate data.
Instructions
In this assessment, select the most appropriate job evaluation method for the organization you identified in your first two assessments.
In a 3–4 page paper:
Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each of the four job evaluation methods: point factor, factor comparison, job ranking, and job classification.
Describe how an employer would use external market benchmarking during the job evaluation process.
Analyze which job evaluation method would be the most effective for the same company you used as the focus in the previous assessments. Also consider whether you would use internal comparisons of job worth only, or you would use a combination of internal comparisons and external marketing. Justify your reasoning.
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

Kaleidoscope Project – Comedy

What makes us laugh? Or, all we need to do is smile?
This week we are looking at comedy, or you can try tragic comedy if you want; try to keep it within your experience base if possible. Indeed, no pressure; have
fun because comedy is so hard, I think, way harder than tragedy. What’s funny?
As always, your story for this assignment is no more than a creative, imaginative, and critical thinking exercise! So take your time, be free, and share your
perspective on what’s funny! I am sitting here, and I cannot think of one funny thing!
Try to create a story that feels relevant to your idea of comedy. For example, some people say an audience is likelier to learn from a good comedy because it
catches us off-guard. Well, that’s not funny, but it means you can think from your perspective of what needs to be shared or spoken. Your Spine of the story!
To make us laugh? Teach us something? It is totally up to you!
Please write from your perspective or a character’s perspective. It should be 300 words.
What to do?
Try to think of your Spine for the story
Think about what you believe is funny!
Tell the story in writing
Your story should have a beginning, middle, and end.
Your story can be a monologue (spoken by one person)
You can also use a dialogue – a conversation between two people
The work needs to be at least 300 words