Grant Proposal: Enhancing Medication Adherence Among Patients with Chronic Diseases

Write a grant proposal to link it to a PICOT question of interest. You will write a paper, 4–5 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.
1. Write an introduction providing the purpose of the grant.
2. Address your PICOT question supported by qualitative and quantitative research studies.
3. Describe your project using the following:
a. What action steps do you propose to achieve the proposed project outcome?
b. How will you measure your proposed project’s outcomes?
c. What will the timeline for your proposed project be?
4. Provide a proposed budget that identifies the following:
a. Total amount requested.
b. Administrative costs (e.g., secretary, statistician, staff, consultant)
c. Materials and supplies (computers, programs/apps)
5. Write a conclusion explaining why this proposed grant should be approved.

 

Art Historical Critique of Jan van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait

For the Introduction Art Historical Critique Assignment, you will be analyzing the Jan Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Portrait.
THERE ARE FOUR REQUIRED SECTIONS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT:
Description/Subject: As the introductory paragraph for your essay, this section should include
the artist, title, date, and medium of the work; a brief description of the work; a summary of the
story and/or subject; and your rationale for selecting it. Statements like “I picked it because I like
it” or “I chose it because the colors pop” are not appropriate rationales. Your answer should be
based on information about the object and what you thought was interesting about this
information. In other words, it should not be based only on what you see. This summary should
include specific information gathered from your resources and will serve to establish the topic to
be considered.
Formal Analysis: In this section, you will analyze the form of the work of art. The form is the
physical object, independent of any discussion of subject matter, interpretation, or context. The
form includes its size (scale), the type of work (i.e. sculpture, painting, print, drawing, etc.), and
the media used (i.e. oil paint, watercolor, relief sculpture, pencil drawing, etching, etc.). To
analyze the form, the student must also describe the way that the artist used specific elements of
art and the principles of design.
**Do not attempt to describe how the artist used all of the elements and principles, but you
should discuss a minimum of two. Select those that are dominant in the work and that are the
most important for understanding the meaning and context of the work.
**Do not address that meaning or context in this section.
Depending on your experience with art, you may or may not be familiar with the elements of art
and the principles of design. If you are not, you will need to gain a basic understanding of them
by using the resources provided in the textbook and other online sources you find using internet
searches.
Interpretation: In this section, use evidence from the sources provided to draw conclusions
about what the work of art was intended to communicate to the viewers for whom it was
made. Focus on what the work of art meant in its time and place, not what it means to you
personally or to people now. A work of art can have many different layers of meaning to its
viewers. Levels of interpretation can include political, emotional, and cultural. Interpretation
can also include how the artist intended for the viewer to use the object.
Context: In this final section, use evidence from the sources provided to draw conclusions about
the historical, cultural, and/or artistic context of the work of art. The Subject, Formal Analysis,
and Interpretation sections investigate what a work of art is. They represent the end result of a
deliberate series of choices made by the artist. In this section, you will consider WHY the artist
made those choices. What was happening socially, politically, culturally, etc. and how did these events and currents influence what the artist decided to do in this work? Use the sources
provided to guide you in understanding the context of the work of art that is the subject of this critique. Be specific and focused in your explanation of the context. Provide rationale for your conclusions from information gathered from provided sources.

Addressing Stakeholder Needs in School Administration

 

It is important to note that the first reaction most principals have to situations such as the one described in the case study is to deflect blame towards the school district. Although never easy, being a professional means working with what you have and making decisions with the resources available. Metaphorically, throwing your hands in the air and lamenting that the school district is to blame does nothing to address the issues. Successful school leaders develop a holistic perspective that sees the bigger picture.

The purpose of this assignment is to address how site administrators can strive to accommodate all stakeholders while taking responsibility for what happens on the school campus.

Part 1: Case Analysis

Respond to the case study by addressing the following :

Brief summary of the case
Identify the issues to be resolved
Stakeholders involved in the issues
One or two existing laws or court rulings that relate to the issues
District policies that relate to the issues
Possible solutions to the issues
The solutions chosen to resolve the issues
Action steps (2-5) for implementing each solution, including a timeline for each step
Potential moral and legal consequences of each solution
Part 2: Rationale

Support the case analysis with a 250-500 word rationale explaining the solutions you chose and how each solution:

Reflects professional ethics, integrity, and fairness.
Promotes social justice and ensures that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling.
Promotes collaboration, trust, learning, and high expectations.

 

 

Understanding the Context for Teaching and Learning: A Community and School Analysis

Closely observe the community, school (the building, faculty, students, processes and protocols), classroom, and educators where you are working and submit an analysis that describes elaborates the context for teaching and learning. This analysis includes a detailed description of your school and community in both a quantitative and qualitative manner. The analysis extends beyond a mere description of the setting and includes a thoughtful observation and analysis of the school and community; it tells a story about both the context and the beginning of school practices.

Describe the cultural context of the local school and community, to what extent are diversity, equity, and different cultural practices honored; use the data you have collected for the Ecological Portfolio, also check your school and county website for additional information. To better understand your context of teaching, please analyze these items with respect to the practices, procedures, and messages impacting your students development.

Focus on the following four elements: reflection, content, connections, and criticality:

Reflective analysis: includes the review and analysis of events and/or issues that draw together multiple perspectives and resources to come to a new understanding of the event or issue.
Content: addresses a substantial range of areas of teaching and learning and makes meaningful connections across these areas.
Connections: establishes / examines a significant number of links with outside resources and relevant theory; these resources are used carefully support and guide the structured reflection.
Criticality: includes observations and interpretations of diversity, equity, and cultural context.
it should be 1,250 1,750 words (exclusive of references). The analysis includes 4-5 academic references to course material; appropriately cited in APA format.