The Ubiquitous Threat of Cybercrime: Safeguarding Global Financial Systems

 

Choose a global financial crime threat for your final paper such as money laundering or cybercrime. Additional sources and references should be utilized to complete the paper, which will be based on your search for and application of additional sources/references.
You must cover the following areas in your discussion:

How widespread is the threat you chose?
Does the threat pose any danger to economic stability of a region or a nation?
Identify and evaluate enforcement strategies being utilized to combat the threat.
Does the threat have applications for abuse by both global business and global crime?

The Controversial Case of Paul Krueger, Ph.D: A Second Chance in Academia

 

Read this case about Paul Krueger, Ph.D https://webcourses.ucf.edu/courses/1434539/files/99894954?wrap=1. Download Paul Krueger, Ph.D.It’s lengthy but interesting. Then respond to the questions.
a. Should Krueger have been given a second chance? He is a convicted murderer who has served his time in prison–he has paid his dues according to the State of Texas. The Texas Parole Board declared him fit to be released back to society; yet, society and the families of the victims are not very forgiving.
b. Would you be okay with Krueger being one of your professors? How would you feel about him being one of your children’s professors? Why or why not? As convicted felons, think about the vast amount of knowledge and experience a person like this could bring to the criminal justice classroom.

The Systemic Effects of Supreme Court Decisions on Policing and Homeland Security

 

The focus of the final exam will be on the system-wide effects specifically policing and homeland security that various Supreme Court decisions have had, and continue to have, on the field of criminal justice. You will select three Supreme Court cases from the list provided below, outline details of the case and its deposition, and trace the ruling’s repercussions as the various components of the criminal justice system are affected. A single decision has the capacity to greatly alter criminal justice operating procedures. Some decisions have important effects, but their ability to create system-wide changes in policy is moderate. Other decisions have seemingly mundane outcomes, yet end up causing vast changes in policy for various components of the criminal justice system.

First, select 3 Supreme Court case from the list below:

Tennessee v. Garner (1985)
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964)
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Cooper v. Pate (1964)
Cruz v. Beto (1972)
Furman v. Georgia (1972)
Williams v. Florida (1970)
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Powell v. Alabama (1932)
Harris v. United States (1968)
Terry v. Ohio (1968)
Florida v. Harris (2013)
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Weeks v. United States (1914)
Illinois v. Perkins (1990)
Using the selected cases, in your exam;

Summarize the background and details of the case and the justices’ ruling.
Identify the specific component of the criminal justice system that was most affected by the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Provide an in-depth analysis of any operational policy, hiring, or training policy that was, or would be, required to change due to the legal decision.
Describe what systemic effect the Supreme Court’s decision had, or has, for the remaining components of the justice system.
Detail how a single Court ruling can have systemic effects.
Identify and trace system-wide transformation caused by a particular Court ruling.
Cite quotations taken directly from the original court case transcripts. Only select one case from the list upon which to build your response. Citations and basic information pertaining to each case can be found in FindLaw, Oyez, Google, or Bing. For more in depth discussions and original Court documentation, a google search will elicit a plethora of reputable sources. Remember, Wikipedia should never be considered a reputable source of scholarly information.