The Tylenol Crisis: Johnson & Johnson’s Handling of a Catastrophe

 

Discussion: J & J’s Tylenol Crisis
Identify the key stakeholders involved and how did Johnson & Johnson prioritize each one in terms of importance.
Explain the role of ethics in Johnson & Johnson’s credo and business culture, and in its actions and crisis management plan.
How would you describe Johnson & Johnson’s actions from a CSR standpoint? Explain.
Do you agree or disagree with Johnson & Johnson’s actions in handling the crisis. Explain.

Short paragraph is good enough, at least 300 words.

 

Leadership Observation

leadership

First: I want you to write about a leader that I directly observed from, for example, my manager at my work place, she’s a woman, young, ambitious, she knows how to lead her employees and since we are working in a ministry of culture, she’s reflecting the vision of the ministry in our daily taks. Please use the leadership theories that you see is convenient to my situation;•

Skill theory
• Behaviour (“style”) theories
• situational Leadership
• developing theory: “path-goal” behaviours
• transactional leadership
• transformational leadership
• Charismatic Leadership
• Ethically Centred Leadership Styles:
Ethical leadership
Authentic leadership
(Spiritual leadership)
• Servant leadership
• Servant theory
For this task please write only 300 words.

second:Development plan [400 words]
Using relevant academic theory drawn from the course, and informed by your reflections above, give an overview of the things you want to do develop your leadership. Cover ALL of the following:
• Type: What type of leader do you want to be and why?
• Development: What do you need to develop or improve to achieve that?
• Actions: What will you do to so develop or improve: include the “how” and “when” (actions and timescales).
• Feedback: How will you know if you so developed or improved?

Understanding Force-Field Analysis in Change Management

Describe the concept of force-field analysis and the forces that either drive or restrain the change process. Using
the force-field analysis model, discuss a change initiative that you are familiar with, and define the key driving
forces and key restraining forces that impact the change.
In your paper,
Add an introduction that includes a statement informing your reader what topics and subtopics the assignment
will discuss.
Describe the concept of force-field analysis and the forces that either drive or restrain the change process.
Discuss a change initiative that you are familiar with, using the force-field analysis model.
Define the key driving forces and key restraining forces that impact the change.
Create headings for topics and sub-topics.

 

 

 

Understanding Business Ethics: Biblical Foundations, Challenges, and Applications

 

o Prompt:
Clarify what business ethics means with applications. You can draw from work you are doing for other assignments for the course (papers and discussions) for the Final Paper (just remember to cite as appropriate). The paper should include four parts:
• Part 1: Clarify what business ethics means.
• Part 2: Describe Biblical foundations and principles for business ethics.
• Part 3: Comment on challenges in living out ethical principles.
• Part 4: Apply principles to two or three aspects of business covered in class.
o Requirements: Prepare the Final Paper using the following guidelines: • 1,500 – 2,000 words • APA-compliant formatting, including title and reference pages • Minimum of five references

 

Reflection on Article Series and Strengths

 

 

Now that you know you will be receiving the coveted Eddie and Ozzie award, reflect on how you got here. What about your article series was outstanding? Refer back to the articles you wrote from the following assignments to determine these aspects:

M1.6
M3.6
DISCUSSION INSTRUCTIONS

What were the strengths of your series and what article content do you believe you could have improved upon? Attach your second article for your classmates.

In your responses to peers, take on the role of a judge for the Eddie and Ozzie award. Review at least two of your peers’ articles and identify the strengths of the article and why you, as a judge, voted for the article to win the award.