Critically discuss the success – or otherwise – of law in achieving equality between men and women at work.
Category: Business law
Tortious Interference with a Contract
Tortious Interference with a contract happens when a third party influences one of the parties to a contract to breach the contract. Tortious Interference only applies when a written contract between two or more parties is interfered with by a non-party to the contract.
Study the following two cases that demonstrate how courts analyze Tortious Interference. The two cases should be incorporated in your analysis of the case study assignment. Failure to do so will impact your grade. The below cases are useful examples and provide critical language that analyzes and applies the Tortious Interference Rule of Law:
Florian Greenhouse, Inc v. Cardinal IG Corporation (Justia) (Links to an external site.)
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/11/521/2289301/
Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations (Justia)
https://law.justia.com/cases/massachusetts/supreme-court/1990/406-mass-811-3.html
Please follow these steps to complete this assignment:
Download the IRAC Worksheet
Read the case carefully.
Answer the questions listed after the case.
Use the IRAC Worksheet form as your guide in analyzing the case
Tortious Interference with a Contract
Tortious Interference with a contract happens when a third party influences one of the parties to a contract to breach the contract. Tortious Interference only applies when a written contract between two or more parties is interfered with by a non-party to the contract.
Study the following two cases that demonstrate how courts analyze Tortious Interference. The two cases should be incorporated in your analysis of the case study assignment. Failure to do so will impact your grade. The below cases are useful examples and provide critical language that analyzes and applies the Tortious Interference Rule of Law:
Florian Greenhouse, Inc v. Cardinal IG Corporation (Justia) (Links to an external site.)
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/11/521/2289301/
Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations (Justia)
https://law.justia.com/cases/massachusetts/supreme-court/1990/406-mass-811-3.html
Please follow these steps to complete this assignment:
Download the IRAC Worksheet
Read the case carefully.
Answer the questions listed after the case.
Use the IRAC Worksheet form as your guide in analyzing the case
Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines
This is a case review paper for a power and negotiation course. I provided a screen shot with the items that my professor would like included in it, and a rough outline he provided for us . I also added a word document with photos of the case, the paper will be on.
All APA 6th formatting and components are required:
• Title page
• Table of contents
• Abstract
• 5 pages of content with appropriate in-text citations
• References
The events of September 11, 2001 impacted the changes occurring to the private security/law enforcement
How do you believe the events of September 11, 2001 impacted the changes occurring to the private security/law enforcement?
First Amendment rights
A private employer had a policy on the “appropriate use of social media” which stated that employees could not post material on social media accounts that identified them as employees of the organization and presented or advocated positions that directly contradicted the ethics of the organization. The organization had a very detailed value statement that declared the organization was a supporter of human rights for all people without regard to gender, race, national origin, citizenship, sexual orientation, or disability. All employees were given a copy of the policy. An employee who had a Facebook page reposted a Tweet from a politician stating that non-citizens should have no human rights if they were in the country illegally. Another employee forwarded a screenshot of the post to the Human Resources department. The Human Resource department investigated and concluded the post violated the policy. The employee responded that the post was protected by the First Amendment. The organization terminated the employee.
- Did the employer violate the employee’s First Amendment rights?
- The employee later said that the employer’s action fell under the public policy exception to employment at will because it restricted the employee’s participation in the political process. Would the public policy exception apply?
Lack of a thorough examination
A 16-year-old boy was hit by an automobile while riding his bicycle. He was taken to the emergency room by a parent; the physician on call looked him over and sent him home. The boy died a few hours later. Autopsy revealed that he had a massive skull fracture. Was the physician’s lack of a thorough examination the cause of the patient’s death?
Negligence
A woman was in labor. The nurse on duty refused to call the obstetrician. Instead, the nurse sat and read a magazine, ignoring repeated requests from the patient and her husband to call a physician. The husband informed the nurse when his wife was about to deliver, and the nurse told him to sit down. The woman delivered before the obstetrician arrived, and she was injured. Was the hospital liable for the nurse’s negligence?
Pressing charges against an institution
A patient who has not paid a bill has come to the emergency room for medical treatment. While there, a medical assistant notices a large amount of money in her purse. The medical assistant tells the security guard. The guard stands at the patient’s room and refuses to let her leave until she pays some money toward her bill. Can the patient file charges against the hospital? If so, what will the proper complaint read?
Business law
Plaintiff Raymond Vadnais alleged that, in 1986, he visited [a physician] at Beth Israel Hospital’s ear, nose, and throat clinic complaining of ear pain. After antibiotics failed to relieve the pain, [the physician] recommended surgery. However, after [the physician] learned that the plaintiff was infected with HIV, he refused to perform the operation. Should the physician be required to perform the operation?