The Power of Good Design

Review The Power of Good Design and select three of the ten principles noted for good design. Next in R, utilize these three principles in a problem that you will solve. First note the problem to solve, the dataset (where the information was pulled from), and what methods you are going to take to solve the problem. Ensure the problem is simple enough to complete within a two-page document. For example, I need to purchase a house and want to know what my options are given x amount of dollars and x location based on a sample of data from Zillow within each location. Ensure there is data visualization in the homework and note how it relates to the three principles selected.

 

Question: 3 pages
The COSO framework of internal controls is practiced within companies around the world. The objectives of the COSO framework are closely related to its five components. For this week’s activity, please discuss these five components of the COSO framework. Be sure to include each components’ impact on each of the COSO framework objectives. What do you feel an auditor would most be concerned with during an IT audit? Lastly, discuss suggestions for integrating COSO framework compliance into a company in which you are familiar.

Theological Analysis of James 4:1-10

 

T​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​HEOLOGICAL Analysis over James 4:1-10 No Chat GPT. Paper will be scanned. No Plagiarism. No cover page needed. 5 pages of information then add a Bibliography page to cite sources. *Turabian Style Format* Must have an Introductory Paragraph, Conclusion, and a Modern Day Application section at very end. The paper will display depth of understanding and clearly articulate features of the an exegetical analysis. Schools of Thought: Consensus or opposing schools of thought about the theological meaning of this passage are insightfully explained or contrasted. Sources are excellent and used well in the explanation. Explain multiple thoughts of different theological understandings from the text. Personal Analysis: The theological meaning of the passage is clearly developed and good reasoning is employed.​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​1. Exegetical Observations – Numerous and High-Quality exegetical observations are evident. 2. Identification of Structure – Meaningful structure is identified and very well validated as author-intended. 3. Flow of Though – A logical, author-intended flow of thought is effectively argued based upon exegetical observations and identified structure. Paper must have at least 5 SCHOLARLY sources. Sources must be Master level sources

Are Christian Ethics absolutist or relative?

 

Reply to the post below.

Are Christian Ethics absolutist or relative? Let’s take a look at ethical relativism and absolutism.

Ethical relativism states that morality changes with one’s culture, experience, circumstance, and personal preference (Jones et al. 2021, 13). An argument often made for relativism is that what is right for one culture may not be right for another, and that is best. For example, you wouldn’t want to wear shorts and a tank top in Antarctica, but you wouldn’t want to wear winter gear in Florida either. Why would you expect one clothing preference to be better than the other when both were made for their respective climates? Relativism often promotes acceptance and tolerance between people with differing cultures and beliefs. One challenge with this view is that it can become a paradox. If the relativist cannot accurately evaluate reality because of the lense of their culture, doesn’t that mean that their own morality is wrong? Simiairly, if what is right to one relativist is illegal, does that make law unjust? This view could potentially transend into anarchy.

Ethical absolutism is exactly what it sounds like; there are, always have been, and always will be, moral absolutes (Jones et al. 2021, 13). These moral principles apply to everyone at any given time. This helps account for universally valued virtues such as courage and honesty. The difficulty with this ideology is dealing with specific situations. It can also be hard dicerning exactly what morals are absolute.

Christian Ethics defines morality from virtues and principles of the character of God (Rae 2018, 69). It can be applied and integrated with several different approaches, such as virtue, natural law, and divine command ethics. Because of the unchanging chacter of God and the specifically laid out moral laws in the Bible (such as the Ten Commandments), Christian Ethics are absolutist. There are specific laws that are laid out by God (Exodus 20:2-17 and Deut. 5:6-21). Moral obligations can also be determined by God’s character as demonstrated and described by Jesus Christ.

In light of this, something to be considered is ethical subjectivism. Ethical subjectivism is a branch of relativism that says there is nothing objective about morality (Jones et al. 2021, 15). It emphasises that morality is a personal evaluation, so it can change with each individual. Some may argue that Christian ethics can be subjective, as there are numorous different views and interpretations of God’s Word. The immence number of denominations within the church can testify to this. Similairly, because there are instances in the Bible where the will of God seems to contradict previously stated moral laws (Joshua 2, for example), some argue that Christian ethics can have elements of relativism.

However, this doesn’t mean that Biblcal morality is subjective. Details may differ, but that does not mean that every denomination and every viewpoint is correct. According to Malachi 3:6 and Hebrews 13:8, God is unchanging, and thus his will is unchanging. We must also consider that we live in a fallen world, where sometimes the only option is to pick the lesser of two evils.

Galatians 2:1-21,

1. Explain the ritual of circumcision and its origin. Why it was such an important matter to the Jews of Paul’s day?
2. What prompted the Jerusalem Council? Why did the Jews have an aversion to Gentiles?
3. What was the point of the letter sent by the leaders of the Jerusalem church to the church in Antioch? What were the four points of abstinence, and in what way did these pertain to pagan religion?
4. Discuss Paul’s disagreement with the Jerusalem leaders on this matter (as he explains in Galatians 2).
5. Explain Paul’s view of the Law of Moses (see Galatians 3-5). Explain why he accused the Galatian Christians of following another gospel.

Exegesis on the Joban Prologue in the Book of Job. 1:1-2:13

 

W​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​rite an analysis of the place of the text within the book as a whole, discussing any issues of textual corruption, or potential editing. – The genre of elements within this text as a whole and how these relate to wider Old Testament Wisdom literature. – An interpretation of the meaning of its contents, taking into account translation by commentators of any difficult terms and any structural or p​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​oetic considerations. In your exegesis, consider a range of interpretations of the text by different commentators and other writers. What do you see as the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches? Try to plan and structure your argument in such a way that your analysis of the interpretations of others supports and leads to your own conclusions with regard to the place and meaning of the text​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​.