Skip to content
You are a member of the CobaltCare insurance company, which is promoting person health records (PHRs) for all of its insured members. You are hosting a session on how to begin a PHR, exploring what information should be included, and how to keep the PHR content.
You are a member of the CobaltCare insurance company, which is promoting person health records (PHRs) for all of its insured members. You are hosting a session on how to begin a PHR, exploring what information should be included, and how to keep the PHR content.
Revisit the mini-case study Peppercorn Dining from Module 7, and review the discussion posts in response to each mini-case question. How consultants see organizational issues will, in part, determine how the feedback process will be designed. Choosing a diagnostic/analytic model is no small issue. There is no evidence in the case that a particular diagnostic model is driving the data collection process (a potential problem), and there are at least two models that would work. First, the consultants could use an individual based model—such as the one described in Chapter 5. For each job at Peppercorn, the consultants could ask what their data reveals about task identity, skill variety, task significance, autonomy, and feedback in the context of Peppercorn’s structure. But this is a more limited perspective and not as good a choice. Perhaps more relevant in this case, would be an organization-level diagnostic model such as the one presented in Chapter 5.
Now you are asked to provide details regarding what concepts or models might help you analyze the data? What conclusions would you draw from the analysis?
Assignment Task:
Using on organization-level diagnostic model such as the one presented in Chapter 5, provide detailed analysis of the collected data. For each component of the diagnostic model, include specific evidence from the case study regarding evidence or lack thereof, and any conclusions would you draw from the analysis. Your responses should Include the following diagnostic areas:
Inputs
Design Components
Strategy
Technology
Other processes if relevant
Structure
Management processes
Measurement systems
Human resource systems
Alignment and effectiveness
Strategy
Design components
Revisit the mini-case study Peppercorn Dining from Module 7, and review the discussion posts in response to each mini-case question. How consultants see organizational issues will, in part, determine how the feedback process will be designed. Choosing a diagnostic/analytic model is no small issue. There is no evidence in the case that a particular diagnostic model is driving the data collection process (a potential problem), and there are at least two models that would work. First, the consultants could use an individual based model—such as the one described in Chapter 5. For each job at Peppercorn, the consultants could ask what their data reveals about task identity, skill variety, task significance, autonomy, and feedback in the context of Peppercorn’s structure. But this is a more limited perspective and not as good a choice. Perhaps more relevant in this case, would be an organization-level diagnostic model such as the one presented in Chapter 5.
Now you are asked to provide details regarding what concepts or models might help you analyze the data? What conclusions would you draw from the analysis?
Assignment Task:
Using on organization-level diagnostic model such as the one presented in Chapter 5, provide detailed analysis of the collected data. For each component of the diagnostic model, include specific evidence from the case study regarding evidence or lack thereof, and any conclusions would you draw from the analysis. Your responses should Include the following diagnostic areas:
Inputs
Design Components
Strategy
Technology
Other processes if relevant
Structure
Management processes
Measurement systems
Human resource systems
Alignment and effectiveness
Strategy
Design components
PsychotherapyNet. (2009, May 7). Irvin Yalom outpatient group psychotherapy videoLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/PwnfWMNbg48
In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:
• What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
• What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
• What did you notice that the therapist did well?
• Explain something that you would have handled differently.
• What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?
• Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?
• Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
PsychotherapyNet. (2009, May 7). Irvin Yalom outpatient group psychotherapy videoLinks to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/PwnfWMNbg48
In a 3- to 4-page paper, identify the video you selected and address the following:
• What group therapy techniques were demonstrated? How well do you believe these techniques were demonstrated?
• What evidence from the literature supports the techniques demonstrated?
• What did you notice that the therapist did well?
• Explain something that you would have handled differently.
• What is an insight that you gained from watching the therapist handle the group therapy?
• Now imagine you are leading your own group session. How would you go about handling a difficult situation with a disruptive group member? How would you elicit participation in your group? What would you anticipate finding in the different phases of group therapy? What do you see as the benefits and challenges of group therapy?
• Support your reasoning with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources, and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
What is a leadership development?
Building a working philosophy statement of family life education. (Note: this assignment is taken from the Required Reading listed below.)
Follow the guidelines below and design your own working philosophy of family life education. Address the questions in your discussion. (Duncan, S. F., & Goddard, H. W. 2011 p. 24)
• What are my beliefs about the family and the nature and quality of family life and the human experience?
• What is a “family”? How important are families? What values do I hold regarding families and the human experience? What does it mean to be human?
• What are my beliefs about the purpose of FLE?
• What is the nature of FLE? What value does FLE have in communities? Is it to provide insight, skills, and knowledge? Is it to change behavior? How “interventionist” should FLE be?
• What are my beliefs about the content of FLE?
• Of what value is university-based theory and research to families? Of what value is the lived experience of individuals, families, and communities, and how can it become part of the content of FLE? How do my personal values regarding families and the human experience influence the content I select?
• What are my beliefs about the process of learning for families in outreach settings?
• How do individuals and families learn most effectively? What teaching strategies have the greatest impact? How important are learning goals and evaluation in these processes? What assumptions do I hold about learners?
How does the military battle commitment to “leave no man behind” exemplify the vested interest model of human helping behavior
Chipotle company analysis