Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Is there sufficient public data for the US to use CPM to determine an arm’s length price?
Sample Answer
Availability of Sufficient Public Data for the Comparable Profits Method (CPM) in the United States
Thesis Statement: While there is a significant amount of public data available in the United States, the availability of sufficient data for the Comparable Profits Method (CPM) to determine an arm’s length price depends on various factors such as industry, size of the company, and level of transparency.
Introduction: The Comparable Profits Method (CPM) is a transfer pricing method that compares the profitability of a controlled transaction to that of independent comparable transactions. The availability of public data plays a crucial role in implementing the CPM effectively. This essay will examine the level of public data availability in the United States and its sufficiency for the CPM.
Body:
Industry-specific Data:
Some industries in the United States have more publicly available data than others. Industries with publicly traded companies, such as manufacturing or retail, tend to have more comprehensive financial information compared to sectors such as services or technology.
Therefore, the availability of sufficient public data for the CPM would vary depending on the industry under consideration.
Size of the Company:
Larger companies often have more extensive financial disclosures, making it easier to find relevant public data for transfer pricing analysis.
Smaller companies, on the other hand, may not have the same level of reporting requirements, reducing the availability of public data. This can pose challenges when applying the CPM.
Level of Transparency:
The level of transparency in financial reporting can vary among companies. Some companies voluntarily disclose detailed financial information, while others may provide limited information.
Publicly traded companies, as required by securities regulations, generally provide more transparent financial statements, which can be useful for the CPM analysis.
However, private companies may not have the same reporting obligations, leading to potential limitations in the availability of relevant public data.
Accessibility of Data:
While there is a significant amount of public data available in the United States, accessing and analyzing this data can be a complex task. It requires expertise in data collection, normalization, and comparability adjustments to ensure accurate analysis.
Additionally, the data may be scattered across various sources, making it time-consuming and challenging to gather the necessary information for the CPM analysis.
Use of Proprietary Data:
In some cases, companies may have access to proprietary data that is not publicly available. This data can provide valuable insights for the CPM analysis but may not be accessible to tax authorities or other external parties.
Conclusion: While the United States has a significant amount of public data, the availability of sufficient data for the Comparable Profits Method (CPM) depends on various factors. Industry-specific data, the size of the company, level of transparency, and accessibility of data all play a role in determining the sufficiency of public data for the CPM. It is essential for tax authorities and businesses to consider these factors and potentially supplement public data with other sources, such as proprietary data or industry surveys, to ensure accurate transfer pricing analysis using the CPM.
