Applying Ethical and Christian Frameworks to an Ethical Dilemma

 

Title: Applying Ethical and Christian Frameworks to an Ethical Dilemma

Introduction:
In this paper, we will examine an ethical dilemma through the lens of two ethical frameworks: Utilitarianism and a Christian worldview. By considering the virtues and principles within each framework, we will apply them to the scenario and evaluate their effects. Additionally, we will explore how the ethical framework aligns with Christian principles, as guided by biblical passages and teachings.

Ethical Framework: Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism is a teleological ethical framework that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being. It asserts that the morally right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.

Basic Principles:

Principle of Utility: The ethical value of an action is determined by its consequences. The action that maximizes overall happiness or well-being is morally right.
Hedonistic Calculus: Happiness is quantifiable and can be measured through factors such as pleasure, pain, intensity, duration, certainty, and remoteness.

Application to the Scenario:
In the given ethical dilemma, which involves allocating limited healthcare resources during a pandemic, Utilitarianism would recommend making decisions based on maximizing overall well-being. This could involve prioritizing patients with higher chances of survival or those who require urgent medical attention. By following the principle of utility, the goal is to save more lives and minimize suffering.

Evaluation:
Utilitarianism provides a systematic approach to decision-making by focusing on the consequences of actions. It prioritizes the welfare of the majority and seeks to maximize overall well-being. However, it may raise concerns about individual rights and fairness, as it may justify sacrificing the needs of a few for the greater good.

Other Considerations:
While Utilitarianism provides a valuable ethical framework, it is important to consider other factors, such as justice, fairness, and individual autonomy. These considerations can help address potential shortcomings of Utilitarianism’s emphasis on maximizing overall happiness.

Ethical-Christian Worldview Framework:
In a Christian worldview, ethical principles are rooted in biblical teachings and virtues such as love, compassion, justice, and humility. The teachings of Jesus Christ guide Christians in their moral decision-making.

Application to the Scenario:
From a Christian worldview perspective, the allocation of limited healthcare resources should reflect the virtues emphasized in biblical passages. This includes treating others with love and compassion (Matthew 5:1-10), practicing selflessness (I Corinthians 13:1-13), displaying the fruits of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23), and exhibiting kindness and forgiveness (Ephesians 4:25-32).

Evaluation:
A Christian worldview framework places emphasis on caring for the vulnerable, promoting justice, and displaying virtues that align with biblical teachings. It highlights the importance of valuing each individual as made in the image of God and treating them with dignity, respect, and love.

Alignment with Christian Principles:
The principles derived from a Christian worldview align closely with Christian virtues and teachings. They emphasize the intrinsic worth of every individual and guide believers to act in ways that reflect God’s love and compassion towards others. The principles also encourage believers to prioritize justice, fairness, and mercy in their decision-making.

Conclusion:
By applying Utilitarianism and a Christian worldview framework to an ethical dilemma, we can gain insights into different perspectives on moral decision-making. While Utilitarianism focuses on maximizing overall well-being, a Christian worldview emphasizes virtues rooted in biblical teachings. Both frameworks offer valuable insights into ethical considerations, but it is crucial to evaluate their effects in relation to individual rights, fairness, and justice. Integrating these frameworks can contribute to a more comprehensive approach to ethical dilemmas that considers both consequences and values consistent with Christian principles.