Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Some people have criticized alternative dispute resolution and diversion programs as picking the least serious offenders for participation and then lauding their success. There have also been criticisms of gender and race disparity in acceptance into these programs. Should these programs attempt to treat and reform more serious offenders? What could be done to the eligibility criteria for these programs to ensure that they are not discriminating with regard to which cases get diverted and which remain in the traditional court system?
