No More Worries!


Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

Paper Formatting

  • Double or single-spaced
  • 1-inch margin
  • 12 Font Arial or Times New Roman
  • 300 words per page

No Lateness!

image Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay

AEW Guarantees

image

  • Free Unlimited revisions
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Money Return guarantee
  • Plagiarism Free Writing

AICPA ethical violation

So, we’ve worked up the following scenario-driven exercise to see if you can deduce what does and does not constitute an AICPA ethical violation and to explain “why?”.
Step 1: Review the AICPA code of professional conduct Links to an external site..
You don’t need to read the code from cover to cover but do make a pass through the document to see what it entails.
You’ll also want to reference our earlier video on AICPA ethicsLinks to an external site..
Step 2: Review each of the ethical scenarios below:
Toggle the accordion to reveal the scenario details.
Jessica Alma
Jessica Alma has been serving as the senior auditor on the audit of Carolina BioHealth, Inc. Because of her outstanding work, the head of internal audit at Carolina BioHealth extended her an offer of employment to join the internal audit department as an audit manager. When the discussions with Carolina BioHealth began, Jessica informed her office’s managing partner and was removed from the audit engagement.
Miller and Yancy CPAs
The audit firm of Miller and Yancy, CPAs, has joined an association of other CPA firms across the country to enhance the types of professional services the firm can provide. Miller and Yancy share resources with other firms in the association, including audit methodologies, audit manuals, and common IT systems for billing and time reporting. One of the partners in Miller and Yancy has a direct financial interest in the audit client of another firm in the association.
Spencer Dunn
Spencer Dunn is the partner in charge of the audit of Brentwood Bank. Dunn is in the process of purchasing a mountain house and has obtained mortgage financing from Brentwood Bank.
Melanie Greer
Melanie Greer’s audit client has a material investment in Summit, Inc. Greer’s nondependent parents also own shares in Summit, and Summit is not an attest client of Greer’s firm. The amount of her parent’s ownership in Summit is insignificant to Greer’s net worth.
Joe Pugh
Joe Pugh is a former partner in Pinnacle and Hughes, CPAs. Recently, he left the firm to become the chief operating officer of Ensworth Clothing, Inc., an audit client of Pinnacle and Hughes. In his new role, Pugh has no responsibilities for financial reporting. Pinnacle and Hughes made significant changes to the audit plan for the upcoming audit.
Odonnel Inc.
Odonnel Incorporated has struggled financially and has been unable to pay the audit fee to its auditor, Seale and Seale, CPAs, for the 2022 and 2021 audits. Seale and Seale are currently planning the 2023 audit.
Morris and Williams
Morris and Williams, a regional CPA firm, is providing information systems consulting to one of their publicly traded audit clients. They are assisting in implementing a new financial reporting system selected by management.
Chris Lancaster
Chris Lancaster is a financial analyst in the financial reporting department of Cockerham International, a privately held corporation. Chris was asked to prepare several journal entries for Cockerham International related to transactions that have yet to occur. The entries are reflected in financial statements that the company recently provided to the bank in connection with an outstanding loan.
Step 3: Select FOUR scenarios and address the following questions:
Does this scenario represent a violation of the AICPA code of professional conduct?
If “no,” explain clearly why not.
If “yes,” explain the following:
The nature of the violation
The specific rule (part of the code) which is being violated
The rationale for the relevant rule
Step 4: Post your ethical analysis for your four scenarios in a discussion post.
Copy and paste the scenario description and the answers to the step 3 questions.
Make a single post that includes all your scenarios (rather than four separate posts).

 

Sample Solution 

  • Does this scenario represent a violation of the AICPA code of professional conduct?

No. Jessica Alma did the right thing by informing her office’s managing partner about the offer of employment from Carolina BioHealth.

Scenario 1: Jessica Alma

  • Does this scenario represent a violation of the AICPA code of professional conduct?
    • No. Jessica Alma did the right thing by informing her office’s managing partner about the offer of employment from Carolina BioHealth. This is in accordance with Rule 101-1, which states that a member in public practice shall not accept a contingent fee for services performed as an accountant. By informing her managing partner, Jessica Alma ensured that there was no conflict of interest between her current audit engagement and her potential employment with Carolina BioHealth.

Scenario 2: Miller and Yancy CPAs

  • Does this scenario represent a violation of the AICPA code of professional conduct?
    • Yes. The partner in Miller and Yancy who has a direct financial interest in the audit client of another firm in the association is in violation of Rule 101-6, which states that a member in public practice shall not have a financial interest in or be a party to a financial interest of a client that impairs his or her independence in the performance of professional services. The partner’s financial interest in the audit client of another firm in the association creates a conflict of interest that could impair his or her independence in the performance of professional services for Miller and Yancy’s clients.

Scenario 3: Spencer Dunn

  • Does this scenario represent a violation of the AICPA code of professional conduct?
    • No. Spencer Dunn is not in violation of any AICPA code of professional conduct rules. Rule 101-1, which prohibits contingent fees, does not apply to mortgage financing. Additionally, Rule 101-6, which prohibits financial interests that impair independence, does not apply because Spencer Dunn’s mortgage financing from Brentwood Bank is not a direct financial interest in Brentwood Bank.

Scenario 4: Chris Lancaster

  • Does this scenario represent a violation of the AICPA code of professional conduct?
    • Yes. Chris Lancaster is in violation of Rule 203, which prohibits knowingly falsifying or misleading entries in financial statements. By preparing journal entries for Cockerham International related to transactions that have yet to occur, Chris Lancaster is knowingly falsifying the company’s financial statements.

The rationale for the relevant rule in each of these scenarios is to protect the public interest. By ensuring that accountants are independent and that their financial interests do not impair their objectivity, the AICPA code of professional conduct helps to ensure that the public can rely on the accuracy and reliability of financial statements.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
PLACE AN ORDER NOW

Compute Cost of Paper

Subject:
Type:
Pages/Words:
Single spaced
approx 275 words per page
Urgency:
Level:
Currency:
Total Cost:

Our Services

image

  • Research Paper Writing
  • Essay Writing
  • Dissertation Writing
  • Thesis Writing

Why Choose Us

image

  • Money Return guarantee
  • Guaranteed Privacy
  • Written by Professionals
  • Paper Written from Scratch
  • Timely Deliveries
  • Free Amendments