Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
Compare the ways Columbus and Las Casas described the environment and peoples of the New World. How do you account for the similarities and differences in their observations?
Sample Answer
A Comparison of Columbus and Las Casas’ Descriptions of the New World
Introduction
Christopher Columbus and Bartolomé de Las Casas were both explorers and chroniclers of the New World during the 15th and 16th centuries. Their descriptions of the environment and peoples they encountered differed in significant ways. This essay aims to compare their observations and analyze the factors that account for both the similarities and differences in their accounts.
Similarities in Descriptions
Natural Resources: Both Columbus and Las Casas noted the abundance of natural resources in the New World, including fertile land, precious metals, and exotic flora and fauna.
Physical Appearance: Both explorers described the indigenous peoples they encountered as having a brown complexion, although their interpretations of physical characteristics varied.
Differences in Descriptions
Treatment of Indigenous Peoples: Columbus initially portrayed the indigenous peoples as friendly and accommodating, while Las Casas later criticized the cruelty and mistreatment inflicted upon them by the Spanish colonizers.
Cultural Practices: Columbus emphasized the perceived primitiveness of indigenous cultures, highlighting their lack of advanced technology and social structures. Las Casas, on the other hand, sought to understand and appreciate indigenous cultures, emphasizing their sophistication and respect for nature.
Religious Beliefs: Columbus saw the conversion of indigenous peoples to Christianity as a crucial part of his mission, while Las Casas advocated for a more tolerant approach, respecting their own religious beliefs.
Factors Influencing Differences
Perspective: Columbus approached the New World with a Eurocentric lens, viewing indigenous cultures as inferior. Las Casas, influenced by his experience as a colonizer turned advocate for indigenous rights, sought to challenge these biases and promote a more empathetic understanding.
Motivations: Columbus was primarily driven by economic gain and exploration under the patronage of Spanish monarchs. In contrast, Las Casas was motivated by a desire for justice and humanitarian concerns, advocating for the protection of indigenous peoples’ rights.
Timing: Columbus’ descriptions were based on his initial encounters with indigenous peoples, whereas Las Casas’ observations were influenced by the Spanish colonization process and his later reflections on its impact.
Conclusion
The differences in Columbus and Las Casas’ descriptions of the New World can be attributed to various factors, including their perspectives, motivations, and timing. While both acknowledged the abundance of natural resources and shared certain observations about physical appearance, their attitudes towards indigenous cultures and treatment diverged significantly. Columbus’ Eurocentric lens led him to emphasize perceived primitiveness, while Las Casas sought to understand and appreciate indigenous cultures. Furthermore, Las Casas’ experiences as a colonizer-turned-advocate for indigenous rights influenced his more critical stance towards Spanish colonization. The contrasting accounts of Columbus and Las Casas serve as a reminder that historical narratives are shaped by the perspectives and motivations of those who record them.
