PART 1
Week 3 Reflection Questions – Due
Hide Assignment Information
Instructions
Week Three Reflection Questions:
Read this article:
https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/phonics-and-decoding/articles/new-model-teaching-high-frequency-words
What is a key take away from the article about teaching Heart Words? How is this applicable to you/your students? The students are 3rd graders.
PART 2
Deep-dive into at least 3 resources from the module (i.e. 1 article, 1 video, 1 link) and respond to the four reflection questions in the Microsoft Word document. Justify/Refer to the resources that shaped your perspective in your reflection.
USE THESE:
Questioning Payne | Learning for Justice
Jonathan Villafuerte: FLY Scholars: Reframing the Narrative | TED Talk
LOOK AT ATTACHED ASPEN FALLS 7A
Answer the questions for the attached ASPEN FALLS 7
PART 3
This week is about teaching more, not less to disadvantaged students. It is your free option to do ONE of the following and post it for your classmates to view & comment:
1. write a letter or poem from your perspective or a fictional student’s perspective (like FLY from the TedX video)
2. draw a picture, create a virtual collage, or any visual representation of what teaching more means to you
3. create slam poetry or write freely about what teaching more signifies
4. create a graphic or flyer on https://www.canva.com/ to invite teachers to teach more, explaining what that signifies (post finished product here for classmates to see)
5. post a photo with explanation of what teaching more, not less looks like
Comment on at least one other classmate’s post with a glow (praise), connection, or inquiry (question to learn more) related to at least ONE RESOURCE from this week’s module.
Criteria Level 5
100 points Level 4
90 points Level 3
80 points Criterion Score
Criterion Student shows meaningful personal reflection & connection to the module’s resources. The original creative piece demonstrates vivid & vibrant imagery. While language & grammar may be nonconventional for artistic purposes, the piece is polished and creative choices within add “flow” that is appropriate to the piece & prompt. Student participates fully in discussion. Student shows thorough reflection & a connection to the module’s resources. The piece takes artistic risk and is cohesive. The majority of the piece “flows” but can lend itself choppy or disconnected in 1-2 lines. Student participates fully in discussion. Student completes assignment according to directions and there is evidence of reflection though it may be superficial in places. 3-4 lines seems disconnected or choppy from the prompt as a whole. Student participates partially in discussion.