Police Department’s Decision to Dismiss the Case
In the video, it is clear that the police department made the right decision by dismissing the case against the juvenile. The decision was justified based on the evidence presented, which showed that the interrogation techniques used by the detective were improper and violated the juvenile’s rights.
The video highlighted that the detective engaged in a “bad interrogation” by coercing and pressuring the juvenile into making a false confession. The detective used leading questions, made promises of leniency, and employed manipulative tactics to obtain a confession. These tactics undermine the integrity of the justice system and violate the rights of individuals, especially vulnerable populations like juveniles.
By dismissing the case, the police department acknowledged that the interrogation methods employed were unethical and compromised the reliability of any evidence obtained. This decision ensures that justice is not served based on coerced confessions, but rather on sound and legally obtained evidence. It sends a message that such practices will not be tolerated and contributes to maintaining public trust in law enforcement.
Changes or Procedures to Reduce Unethical Practices
As a change agent in a police department, I would institute several changes and procedures to reduce unethical practices during interviews and interrogations. Some key measures include:
- Training and Education: Implement comprehensive training programs for all officers involved in interviews and interrogations. This training should focus on proper questioning techniques, understanding legal rights, and recognizing signs of coercion or manipulation. Officers should be regularly updated on best practices and legal developments in this area.
- Video Recording: Make it mandatory to record all interviews and interrogations with audio and video. This ensures transparency, accountability, and provides an accurate record of the process. Video recordings can be used to review the conduct of officers, assess the validity of confessions, and address any complaints or allegations of misconduct.
- Independent Oversight: Establish an independent oversight body to monitor and review interviews and interrogations. This body should have the authority to investigate complaints against officers, conduct audits of procedures, and ensure compliance with ethical standards. Independent oversight enhances public trust and holds law enforcement accountable for their actions.
- Legal Representation: Ensure that individuals being questioned have access to legal representation during interviews and interrogations, especially for vulnerable populations such as juveniles or individuals with cognitive impairments. Legal representation helps safeguard their rights and provides guidance on how to navigate the process.
- Continued Evaluation: Regularly evaluate the effectiveness of interview techniques and procedures through internal reviews or external audits. This evaluation should involve input from legal experts, community organizations, and other stakeholders to ensure that practices align with current legal standards and ethical considerations.
By implementing these changes, police departments can significantly reduce the risk of unethical practices during interviews and interrogations. They promote fairness, protect individual rights, and ultimately enhance the credibility and trustworthiness of the criminal justice system.
Response to Classmate’s Post
In response to my classmate’s post, I agree with their suggestion of utilizing body cameras during interviews and interrogations as a means to reduce unethical practices. Body cameras provide an objective record of interactions between officers and individuals being questioned, ensuring transparency and accountability. This measure can help deter misconduct by both officers and individuals being interviewed.
Additionally, body cameras can serve as valuable evidence in cases where allegations of coercion or manipulation arise. It can provide an accurate account of what transpired during the interview or interrogation, aiding in the assessment of the reliability of any obtained confessions.
Overall, body cameras offer a practical solution to address unethical practices during interviews and interrogations. They provide an unbiased record of interactions, promote accountability, and contribute to a more transparent criminal justice system.
Our orders are delivered strictly on time without delay 
