In her article “Texas and the Master Civil Rights Narrative: A Case Study of Black Females in Houston,” Merline Pitre challenge
Full Answer Section
Article Review: Texas and the Master Civil Rights Narrative: A Case Study of Black Females in Houston
In her article “Texas and the Master Civil Rights Narrative: A Case Study of Black Females in Houston,” Merline Pitre challenges the dominant narrative of the civil rights movement in Texas. She argues that this narrative, which is often centered on the experiences of white activists, leaves out the important contributions of black Texans, particularly black women.
Pitre begins by discussing the “master civil rights narrative.” This narrative, she argues, is based on a number of assumptions, including the idea that the civil rights movement was a top-down movement led by white men, that it was primarily a nonviolent movement, and that it was a success. Pitre argues that these assumptions are not accurate, and that they have led to the neglect of the experiences of black Texans in the civil rights movement.
To challenge the master civil rights narrative, Pitre focuses on the experiences of black women in Houston. She argues that black women played a vital role in the civil rights movement in Houston, and that their contributions have been overlooked. Pitre provides evidence to support her argument, including oral histories, newspaper articles, and government documents.
One of the most important contributions of black women in Houston was their work in the NAACP. The NAACP was a major civil rights organization in Houston, and black women were active members. They worked on a variety of projects, including voter registration drives, desegregation efforts, and protests.
Black women also played a leading role in the desegregation of Houston’s public schools. In 1960, a group of black women filed a lawsuit challenging the segregation of Houston’s schools. The lawsuit, known as the Oliver case, was successful, and it led to the desegregation of Houston’s schools.
Pitre’s article makes an important contribution to the historiography of the civil rights movement. She challenges the master civil rights narrative and highlights the important contributions of black Texans, particularly black women. Her article is well-researched and well-argued, and it is an important addition to the literature on the civil rights movement.
Answers to Questions:
- The author poses the question of why the experiences of black Texans, particularly black women, have been overlooked in the master civil rights narrative. She argues that this omission is a result of racism and sexism.
- The author answers this question by providing evidence from a variety of sources, including oral histories, newspaper articles, and government documents. She shows that black women were active in the civil rights movement in Houston, and that they made significant contributions to the movement.
- The author uses a variety of sources in her article, including primary sources (such as oral histories and newspaper articles) and secondary sources (such as the work of other historians). She uses these sources to provide evidence to support her argument.
- The article’s intended audience is scholars and students of the civil rights movement. The article is readable for people with a basic knowledge of the civil rights movement, but it is likely to be of most interest to those who are familiar with the historiography of the movement.
- The author is proposing a new interpretation of the past. She argues that the master civil rights narrative is incomplete, and that it does not accurately reflect the experiences of black Texans, particularly black women. She is suggesting that a more accurate understanding of the civil rights movement can be achieved by including the experiences of black Texans.
Overall, Pitre’s article is an important contribution to the historiography of the civil rights movement. It challenges the master civil rights narrative and highlights the important contributions of black Texans, particularly black women. The article is well-researched and well-argued, and it is an important addition to the literature on the civil rights movement.