The rights granted to individuals under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Fifth Amendment protect individuals against self-incrimination. The Sixth Amendment affords individuals protections in the criminal process. This discussion asks you to examine the rights granted to individuals under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.

Please discuss each of the following:

1. Discuss when Miranda must be given to an individual, including the difference between an arrest and a custodial interrogation.

2. What does the court look for to determine if a confession has been voluntarily given?

Director of respiratory therapy at a large regional medical center.

You are the director of respiratory therapy at a large regional medical center. There is an 85-year-old female Hispanic patient in the adult intensive care unit. The admitting diagnosis for the patient is “stroke.” Prior to admission, the patient had a history of heart and pulmonary problems and lung cancer (successfully treated by surgery and radiation 10 years ago). Tests conducted since admission have discovered early-stage liver cancer. The patient has been in a comatose state ever since admission, unable to communicate or move. Since the patient is unable to breathe on her own, she is also on a ventilator.

The patient was admitted 15 days ago; she is without insurance and has no proof of citizenship. The hospital business office wants to know if she can be discharged from AICU, which costs the hospital $20,000 per day, or if the family will agree to disconnect the ventilator. The attending physician is new on the medical staff and is unsure of the patient’s prognosis.

The AICU is full, so the discharge planner is under pressure from his supervisor to free up the bed needed for other critical patients. The patient’s family is strongly against withdrawal of any life support or reducing any care standard. They have been adamant that God will perform a miracle and the patient will walk out of the hospital. The patient’s children are all adults, natural-born citizens of the U.S. who own a successful, well-known local business.

A local TV station has been ‘covering the story’ although they have not publicly disclosed the patient’s name. The state governor has come out publicly stating that illegal aliens are a drain on our state’s resources and should be sent back to their countries of origin. The governor’s challenger (whose daughter is a nursing student in AICU) says there is a moral duty to care for everyone.

You are scheduled to meet with the hospital ethics committee tomorrow. After the meeting, you, the physician, and the AICU chaplain are to meet with the patient’s family regarding the patient’s course of care. How will you prepare for the upcoming meeting with the hospital ethics committee? What issues do you expect will come up during that meeting? What will you say to the patient’s family?

Advanced pathophysiology

 

ALTERATIONS IN CELLULAR PROCESSES
At its core, pathology is the study of disease. Diseases occur for many reasons. But some, such as cystic fibrosis and Parkinson’s Disease, occur because of
alterations that prevent cells from functioning normally.
Understanding of signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment of many diseases. For the Advanced
Practice Registered Nurse (APRN), this understanding can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.
For this Discussion, you examine a case study and explain the disease that is suggested. You examine the symptoms reported and explain the cells that are
involved and potential alterations and impacts.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific scenario for this Discussion. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for
your assignment from your Instructor.
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 1
Post an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation:
The role genetics plays in the disease.
Why the patient is presenting with the specific symptoms described.
The physiologic response to the stimulus presented in the scenario and why you think this response occurred.
The cells that are involved in this process.
How another characteristic (e.g., gender, genetics) would change your response.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

 

 

 

Veterinary periodontics

Explain why periodontal disease is common in dogs and cats, the main causes, and how some forms of the disease are treated.
What are the steps involved in an extraoral, and intraoral dental examination, and what’s the rationale behind doing an extraoral examination to assess dental disease?
Describe the early stages of periodontal disease, and its pathogenesis.
What are the materials commonly used for surgical intervention in cases of Grade IV periodontal disease, and how these materials help restore health to the periodontal tissue.
Determine the preventive measures that can be used by clients, and how you would educate them in this regard.

The Fifth Amendment

 

 

 

 

 

The Fifth Amendment protect individuals against self-incrimination. The Sixth Amendment affords individuals protections in the criminal process. This discussion asks you to examine the rights granted to individuals under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.
Please discuss each of the following:
1. Discuss when Miranda must be given to an individual, including the difference between an arrest and a custodial interrogation.
2. What does the court look for to determine if a confession has been voluntarily given?

Case brief of Katz V. U.S & Terry V. Ohio

 

Case Citation: Names of parties, the court that decided the case, the year of decision, etc.
Facts: Only state the important facts on the case, i.e., those that impact the outcome. One or two paragraphs should generally suffice to state the facts.
Issue(s): Sometimes called the question(s) presented, this portion of the brief clearly states, usually in the form of a question, the issue or issues that the
parties are asking the court to decide. Some cases only present one issue, others present multiple issues.
Procedural History: What happened with this case in the lower courts? How were the issue(s) decided by the trial court? The intermediate appellate court?
Decision(s): Sometimes also called the holding(s), this is the court’s determination of the issue(s) presented. These decisions or holdings become law. In the
case of the U.S. Supreme Court, these decisions become the law of the land.
Reasoning: Sometimes also called analysis, this portion of the brief explains how and why the court reached its decision, including a discussion of the earlier
cases that the court followed, overruled or distinguished.
Separate Opinions: Discuss any concurring or dissenting opinions, including their proposed holdings and reasoning.
Impact on Discretion: Who are the winners? Who are the losers? Who benefits from the court’s decision? Who is hurt by it? Why?

 

the gut microbiome and psoriasis severity

 

What is the specific relationship between the gut microbiome and psoriasis severity in a sample of 100 adults between 30-40 yrs of age over 12mth period
Research Proposal Project
In which students develop their own research proposal of a unit of
research interest within the allied health sector. Preferably within
the Aesthetics domain.
The research proposal should:
• Indicate a literature review with 2 studies on the unit of the
research proposal
• Describe the nature of the proposed research, including the
design and methodology
• Describe the research hypothesis
• Identify the research approach
• Describe the methods of data collection and analysis
• Identify any potential ethical or ‘political’ difficulties
associated with the research.
Word length 2,000 words, inclusive of in-text citations. A minimum of 15 in APA 7th Edition, please include all in-text references

 

 

 

Constitutional Law Vs. Administrative Law

 

 

 

 

Constitutional law is something you are likely familiar with to some extent, but the laws around administrative law may be less familiar. While the Constitution outlines many specific laws, it does not necessarily speak much about what happens in the administration of our government. For this assignment, you are asked to look at where constitutional and administrative law intersects and where they diverge.

Write a 3–4 page paper that includes the following three parts:

An explanation of the areas in which constitutional and administrative law intersect.
An explanation of where constitutional and administrative laws diverge.
An evaluation of the impact of the divergence in these laws. What impact does this have on someone working in the field of public administration?
Use at least three sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your sources page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citing sources, access the library or review library guides.

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

Evaluate the concepts of and interactions between constitutional and administrative law in the realm of public administration.

 

 

 

Anti-Money Laundering and Professionals

 

“There is little, if any, justification for the FATF Standard that require lawyers to report suspicious transactions about their clients or otherwise enact comprehensive Anti-Money Laundering regulation of lawyers.”
Do you agree with this statement? You must give reasons for your answer. In answering the question, you must refer to 2 or more countries, including one country that has not adequately implemented the FATF Standard (e.g. United
States, Australia) and one country that has complied with the Standard (e.g.member of the European Union, United Kingdom) in relation to Designated non- financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs).
Compulsory Source
Michael Levi (2022) Lawyers as money laundering enablers? An evolving and contentious relationship’, Global Crime, 23:2, 126-146. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2022.2089122